Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 02:14:54
Server time: 05:45:05, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: PQ's 4070

Details

Submitted by[?]: Baltusian International Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4077

Description[?]:

Questions to the President

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:27:56, August 06, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the PQ's 4070
MessageFirstly may I congratulate the President on her new job. My question is- "Do you think it is acceptable to increase Luxury Good Taxes whilst cutting Essential Good tax to 0%. Why should hard-working people pay more for working harder?"

Archibald Stephenson
Deputy Leader of the Conservative Party of Baltusia

Date19:53:29, August 06, 2016 CET
FromFront National Party
ToDebating the PQ's 4070
MessageHere here

(From Members of the Front National)

Date21:17:00, August 06, 2016 CET
FromPatriotic Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the PQ's 4070
MessageWell said!

Date01:06:26, August 07, 2016 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the PQ's 4070
MessageThank you conservative party for congratulating are party on are victory.
Firstly I will say yes I think it is need to tax more for luxury good because if you haven't realized that are economy has gone down due to the patriotic party and their fiancé leadership. if we tax more are economy goes up and then we can pay are working people more money.
Your second question on cutting tax to 0% we never put this law in place in my opinion I think it should be 5% as 0% is very unrealistic.
Your third question on "why should -hard working people pay more for working harder".As I said if we don't tax them more then we cant pay people more and people will lose their jobs. I know it seem really nice not to tax people but if we are to be able to pay for banks, defence industries etc. We have to tax I don't fell hard working people should not be paid more for unrealistic cuts that will put our nation in debt.

Thank you
Mrs Jennifer Johnson

Date14:12:03, August 07, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the PQ's 4070
MessageMadam President,

The economy is now at an economic boom, at an all time high. This was incurred by our cuts in spending bill. It's wrong that you are taking money off people unnecessarily when the economy is booming.

Also in response to your response about taxing people. We don't have to pay for banks and defence industries, that's why we want them privatised. We don't need to tax people loads when we wont use it. Hard working people should get to keep more of their money in their pocket at a time when there is an economic boom.

Archibald Stephenson

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
         

Total Seats: 664

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 86


    Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself.

    Random quote: "Anarchy is the true nature of all things. Monarchy, democracy, communism, all useless forms to control the human mind. But a mind cannot be controlled. It cannot be restrained. It has no boundaries. It has its will. Anarchy is the true nature of all things." - Alex Battig

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56