We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Disarm Jakania
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party for a Democratic Socialist Society
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2181
Description[?]:
| We believe in a more disarmed Jakania, that doesn't use nuclear weapons. These weapons are more a threat on itself, then that they actually are for other nations. If ever a country will try to attack Jakania, they will not do it with nuclear weapons: since in that case, they cannot have any serious victory in war: it would be very stupid to wage war over a terrain that cannot be used for the next 150 years because it is destroyed by nuclear warfare. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:40:54, January 28, 2006 CET | From |  Jakania Citizens' Party | To | Debating the Disarm Jakania |
| Message | This seriously damages our country's bargaining chips at the international table, i cannot adhere to this. |
| Date | 19:20:41, January 28, 2006 CET | From | Jakanian Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Disarm Jakania |
| Message | Opposed, if a nation attacks us with Nuclear weapons we should be obliged to retaliate. |
| Date | 08:26:45, January 31, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian-Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Disarm Jakania |
| Message | It's not stupid to use nuclear weapons in war if your only intention is to eradicate a nation off the face of Terra... At least with a few token nukes, we can effectively deter as well as retaliate against nuclear attacks |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 52 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 105 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 93 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr. |