We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Enforcement of Article 9.2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4073
Description[?]:
| Amended circa December 4072 The Constitution thus states: (9.2) A political party shall be registered in accordance with the national laws and may be dissolved in cases of inactivity or for violations of national law. A party has admitted to contravening national law - we believe they should be dissolved. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:43:13, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Mr President, I ask that you carry through your threat to take action against the Freedom Party and Progressive Party for their role in acts of terror. I also ask that you, in line with the constitution, look at dissolving said parties. We wish to continue supporting your administration this term but need you to be strong and act swiftly in this matter as people are dying or being injured every few weeks. Can you spell out how you will proceed, whether you feel it right to declare a state of emergency and let Congress know if you need any temporary emergency powers to deal with this threat more effectively. Bathsheba Grey, Patriotic Party Leader. |
| Date | 19:06:16, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Don't acuse my party of terrisom it's wrong to do so. |
| Date | 20:17:19, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Mr President, i also strongly recommend the death penalty if they are found guilty. |
| Date | 20:54:05, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | We are publicly prosecuting the FP and PP on terrorism offences and also declaring a state of emergency, also KrugerSec are to control congress |
| Date | 21:17:09, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Mr President, we endorse this action. Thank you. |
| Date | 21:20:35, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Mr President, we endorse this action. Thank you. |
| Date | 21:33:29, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | stop don't take us to court mr president are party has done nothing wrong we never endorsed terrorist actions.please |
| Date | 21:51:57, August 10, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | you cant get rid of them its shocking the freedom party clearly are against it and the progressives are passionate is that a crime |
| Date | 22:12:32, August 10, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | I would suggest warrants for their arrest before they try to flee the country. They will seek refuge in some left wing state who will refuse extradition. |
| Date | 07:06:49, August 11, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | My party doesn't fear anything! |
| Date | 12:57:20, August 11, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | Save it for the courtroom, Mr Jacobs! Bathsheba Grey |
| Date | 18:14:46, August 11, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | no stop this now |
| Date | 16:15:51, August 12, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Enforcement of Article 9.2 |
| Message | In accordance with the judge's decision in the court case "State v Progressive Party" this enforcement act is no longer required, as it was deemed to be an individual, not the party, who acted illegally. I now change my vote to NO. Bathsheba Grey. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 256 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 494 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "We must show that liberty is not merely one particular value but that it is the source and condition of most moral values. What a free society offers to the individual is much more than what he would be able to do if only he were free. We can therefore not fully appreciate the value of freedom until we know how a society of free men as a whole differs from one in which unfreedom prevails." - Friedrich August Hayek |