We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2178
Description[?]:
| We, the parties of Likatonia feel compelled to express our displeasure at the delays signing the Likatonian/Valruzian military co-operation treaty. Furthermore, the parties of Likatonia have some grave concerns over the future of the once independent country of Zuma. Individuals in neighbouring Gokitan have had reports of individuals leaving the area due to localised incidents of military persecution and difficult living conditions. Likatonia, with it's fine sense of 'fair play' will not stand by and allow these incidents to keep recurring. We call on the Valruzain government to fast track either acceptance or rejection of the above treaty and to resolve the situation in Zuma before we feel compelled to take direct action. Likatonia, uber alles. -------------------------------------- If this resolution is passed by the convocation, we call on the foreign minister to deliver this notice to the Valruzians immediately. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:21:16, January 29, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | OOC: Got a few typos in there you might want to straighten before we put it to a vote... :) |
| Date | 05:21:37, January 29, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | Other than that - AMA is on-board. |
| Date | 08:08:21, January 29, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | OOC: Pardon the typos. I will learn not to propose wordy resolutions pre-coffee. IC: We thank AMA for their support. |
| Date | 02:43:04, January 30, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | Please note that the Valruzians have just commenced voting on the agreement: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=48233 Consequently we now suggest delaying or defeating this resolution. If the agreement is defeated then perhaps it could be put back on the agenda. TOTAL apologise for the confusion. |
| Date | 06:27:09, January 30, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | Interesting comment from MasterOfChachtice (Deltaria) in the forums: "Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Of course, if our economy collapses a war will always fix it. And I think Valruzia's been particularly unraped by Deltaria in the past few centuries, so they're about due. " |
| Date | 13:58:38, January 30, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | Are the Zumans keen on independence? The Zuman Independence Party seems to be an establishment party now, hardly the voice of protest that it once was. |
| Date | 17:47:46, January 30, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | The latest Valruzian opinions on this matter (it is still in the early stages of debate) are as follows: "Hmm, I can't see any problems with the bill. However, we have intel from sympathizors in Likatonia, that inform us of rumours skipping around political circles in Likatonia that some within the Likatonian government wish to see Zuman 'detached' from Valruzia. We must procede with caution, perhaps we should suggest inviting Lodamun into the Treaty, as a counterbalance to any threat". Perhaps the foreign office might like to suggest to the Valruzian delegates that we are concerned about Zuman rights... but that we are not planning to usurp Valruzian sovereignty. We would much rather try to bring a happy result to the Zuman contingent through negotiations with a partner-state. |
| Date | 17:50:15, January 30, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Statement of Intentions Valruzian Federation/Republic of Likatonia |
| Message | Given the current political situation, and negotiation... AMA is voting against this proposal, at the moment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 392 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 90 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a cheque. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Martin Luther King Jr. |