We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Home Office Police Review and ID Card debate
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4077
Description[?]:
| Debate over the potential to beef up security through new ID Card legislation |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:22:09, August 19, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Home Office Police Review and ID Card debate |
| Message | Mr Speaker, In my role as Home Secretary and Head of Internal Affairs I have been asked by the president to look at our Capitol and National police forces to help prevent security risks and further terrorist acts. The department's increased budget is being used to recruiting more police officers, and to buy new equipment and to carry out more sophisticated security checks at public buildings. We are also investing more in our domestic intelligence agency. However, I am advised that it is also probable that changing the law in terms of making people carry ID cards at all times would also help to reduce the security risk a lot further. So, I would like Congress to debate whether this proposed bill should be enacted. This is now open to debate Thank you, Home Secretary and Patriotic Party Leader Bathsheba Grey. |
| Date | 11:24:04, August 19, 2016 CET | From | Popular Consensus | To | Debating the Home Office Police Review and ID Card debate |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Popular Consensus will support this proposal. Wilmer Jeffries Parliamentary Group Leader |
| Date | 13:23:52, August 19, 2016 CET | From | New Baltusia Party | To | Debating the Home Office Police Review and ID Card debate |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The proposed bill is supported by a majority of the NBP Conference and has won endorsement of President Clara Newman. We vote yes. Elian Bishop NBP Senate Conference Chair |
| Date | 20:41:06, August 19, 2016 CET | From | Front National Party | To | Debating the Home Office Police Review and ID Card debate |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, For a conservative group they do love big government |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 455 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 295 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |