Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 01:17:38
Server time: 02:42:21, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Hamburglar | hamburglar_ | RealHamburglar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Alimony Fund BIll

Details

Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4092

Description[?]:

Introducing a bill which would establish an National Alimony Fund.

Goals of the NAF:
- providing spousal financial maintenance in case of the person obligated to provide financial support for their spouse not being able to do so,
- providing sposual financial maintenance in case of the person obligated to provide financial support for their spouse failing to do so on purpouse,
- prosecuting the debtror through the bailiff in order to collect financial liabllitiies,

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:11:12, September 18, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Alimony Fund BIll
MessageHerr Raabe,

How could possibly a "progress" regress party refuse to support the hard working people of Dorvik rising their children on their own while the person obligated to support their ex-spouse with financial help is avoiding to do so. You accused us of not representing the Dorvisch people while you publicly and ruthlessy showing exactly the opposite.

Johanna Lauernberg, DSU leader.

Date13:09:07, September 18, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Alimony Fund BIll
MessageFrau Laurenberg,

We already have provisions in place, it's called the welfare system. Adding another layer of red tape will merely clog the system up and make it less efficient. Anyone who falls under the poverty line receives benefits. Also this bill discriminates against non-married couples, another reason we prefer not to support the bill for the meantime.

Wilhelm Raabe, State Chancellor

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 81

no
   

Total Seats: 419

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

Random quote: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 43