Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:24:07
Server time: 17:35:52, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Caoimhean | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: D

Details

Submitted by[?]: Universal

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4094

Description[?]:

d

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:16:09, September 23, 2016 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the D
MessageLets leave it as it is! The HoS would be useless, now is more important and more eficient.

Date19:55:47, September 23, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Independant Party
ToDebating the D
MessageAgreed

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 96

no
  

Total Seats: 0

abstain
    

Total Seats: 78


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48