We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privitization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Republican Alliance (NRA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4100
Description[?]:
| A bill to privatize some industries |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on the source code of software.
Old value:: The government does not require that all source be opened but heavilly regulates closed source software.
Current: The government does not require that all source be opened but heavilly regulates closed source software.
Proposed: The government allows both open and closed source software.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government law concerning the sales of recreational drugs.
Old value:: The government is entirely responsible for the controlled sales of recreational drugs through operating stores and other locations.
Current: Recreational drugs sales are handled by private foundations which are heavily regulated by the government.
Proposed: Sales of recreational drugs is completely unregulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Current: Local governments decide the funding policy of sports clubs.
Proposed: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:28:28, October 03, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | My party agrees with the efforts from the Democratic Front in allowing the free market to take over several industries. We support Articles 1 and 2, in allowing the free market to take it's course. We are, however, hesitant in Article 3 of this proposal. Our recreational drug policy is already extremely lax as it stands. While we support the right of our citizens to do as they please, I would ask that instead of this sudden, de-regulatory in drug sales, that we slowly encourage the private industry to take over, guided by governmental regulation. Saddly, I am forced to vote on this bill as a whole, seeing as it was moved to debate. Therefore, we are forced to vote AGAINST this proposal, until such a time as Article 3 is ammended or otherwise made acceptable. Jackson Ruhr, Leader of the LDP. |
| Date | 16:46:28, October 03, 2016 CET | From | National Republican Alliance (NRA) | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | The people should take there own responsibility on the question of recreational drugs herefore we think this deregulation shall bring good quality drugs on the market and cause the people to be able to think for themselves. We should be a model of freedom for the rest of the world in our opinion and this is the first step. Chairman Paul Prescott, Democratic Front |
| Date | 16:55:22, October 03, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | We agree wholeheartedly with our colleges in the Democratic Front. While we support an eventual, fully private enterprise regarding recreational drugs, we are weary of allowing these enterprises to go completely unregulated. Our previous statement still stands, in that while we support this, we cannot simply deregulate it to such an extent. Some of these recreational drugs can easily result in overdoses, and while it is the responsibility of the user to be responsible for their use, a little guidance from slight regulation on private businesses will not hurt anyone., and ensure only pure, safe substances are released to the market. Jackson Ruhr. Leader of the LDP. |
| Date | 17:30:22, October 03, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | We do not agree with article 1 as public sports clubs should exist together with private clubs |
| Date | 17:30:23, October 03, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | We do not agree with article 1 as public sports clubs should exist together with private clubs |
| Date | 20:03:46, October 04, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Privitization Act |
| Message | After much discussion, my party has decided to change it's vote in favor of this proposal, as we believe it will ultimately lead to more civil rights, which is always a good thing. Jackson Ruhr. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 397 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 35 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 168 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |