We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kirlawan People's Justice Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4784
Description[?]:
| Looks like a new part of the game has recently been added :) A "UN Security Council" type arrangement. http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6915 Four new law issues have been added, as a way of providing nations with a way to officially vote on who is to occupy the four seats. Every nation is permitted to vote on all four seats, not only their own continent's. My tentative initial suggestions: Seat A (to be filled by a nation from Artania) Luthori Seat B (to be filled by a nation from Majatra) Istalia Seat C (to be filled by a nation from Seleya) Kalistan Seat D (to be filled by a nation from any of the other continents) Sekowo Kalistan is one of the most RP-active nations of all, and they're very interested in matters such as this; I feel that they'd do a good job and take it very seriously. Plus we share some diplomatic links. Luthori and Istalia are quite busy and active nations, and Kirlawa additionally has cultural-demographic links (to varying degrees) with both; as we do with Sekowo. I'm certainly open to other suggestions, though. (Well, except for voting for ourselves, that is. Right now Kirlawa is too busy, too frantic, for me OOCly already. I very very much do _not_ want it to become even _more_ hectic still, with the additional duties which this would impart.) Are these four nominations acceptable to all parties, or might someone prefer different nation(s) for one or more of the seats? Let's discuss it here, please. Some possible alternative suggestions I'd also be happy with, if other parties would prefer these over the above: A) Rutania or Beluzia; likewise very active nations, though the cultural links are secondhand (_through_ Luthori). B) Kalopia-Wantuni; I like the primary player there. Or Barmenia; an experienced and knowledgeable player. Or Solentia; perpetually very active. C) Hard to pick a second choice from Seleya. Maybe Likatonia, though I'm not familiar with their interest in international RP. Or Mordusia? D) Lourenne; somebody I know from another forum. ;) Or Egelion; one of the most active nations of all, bursting at the seams. Or, Davostag, for fun. :D When I originally posted this, a few hours ago, my suggestion for seat D had been Hutori ... but looking over the two nations, Sekowo is interested (and this might give the lone experienced player there something to do) ... whereas one or more parties in Hutori look like they might be feeling like I do ;) (i.e. they've got enough going on in their own nation and don't want this added on top of it). Plus we have considerable cultural links with Sekowo, even more so than with Hutori. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:02:32, October 05, 2016 CET | From | Ár Ré - Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | Yeah, the list looks good. |
| Date | 19:13:44, October 05, 2016 CET | From | Union of Green Market-Socialists | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | This proposal looks good. |
| Date | 07:40:10, October 06, 2016 CET | From | Green Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | Okay will this prevent wars? |
| Date | 21:11:54, October 06, 2016 CET | From | Kirlawan People's Justice Party | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | Hopefully :) Thank you everyone, and the bill is up: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=487179 Please tell me if you want any changes.... |
| Date | 04:38:11, December 06, 2016 CET | From | Kirlawa Labour Party | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | I have no problems with what I've been shown. |
| Date | 23:51:59, April 09, 2017 CET | From | Royal house of salvia | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | we would be honoured and greatful If u would support vorona For seat D |
| Date | 13:20:13, July 13, 2020 CET | From |  Moderation | To | Debating the OOC: Discussion: Security Council nominations |
| Message | OOC: Archiving. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 750 |
| Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
| Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician |