Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 00:50:10
Server time: 15:09:49, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Archangel_1 | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 4100

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4101

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:04:15, October 06, 2016 CET
From National Republican Alliance (NRA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4100
MessageThank you for once again giving me the trust for the position of Foreign Affairs.
I will support this cabinet and hope we can keep up the good work

Date17:30:00, October 06, 2016 CET
From Rutanian Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4100
MessageConsidering that my party has been fundamental in proposing ecological legislation, I am surprised we were not offered the Environmental ministry, and wished more time had been given to proposing the cabinet. Nevertheless, we believe the SLPR will adequately represent our interests in this ministry. I am honored to have been given the charge of Prime Minister, and hope that I can lead our country to greater growth and prosperity.

Jackson Ruhr.

Date17:31:17, October 06, 2016 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4100
MessageOOC;-We can work together,I do not have any particular reservation for any particular ministry

Date18:27:00, October 06, 2016 CET
From Rutanian Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4100
MessageI am saddened at the dissolution of the NPU. I was looking forward to working with them.

Seeing as they no longer exists as a political entity, I believe new elections must be held.

Jackson Ruhr.
Leader of the LDP.

Date22:52:38, October 06, 2016 CET
From Former Nationmaster of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4100
MessageI unfortunately would not support this cabinet for two main reasons:
1- I hold the smallest share of ministries again, whilst I am not the smallest party. The social liberal party control several ministries including a major department. Whilst I am not against their inclusion in the cabinet and the positions they have been given, I do find it slightly unfair that my party revive only a single small department.
2-The involvement of the DSPR makes this a center left cabinet and I am a center right Party. I believe cross spectrum coalitions like this one don't work and should not be created. Also I have quarreled bitterly with the DSPR in the past and whilst we are less aggressive towards each other now, there are many things which we fundamentally disagree on and I believe our tensions would make coalition very hard to work with.
Beatrice Lloyd
Leader of the Conservative People's Party

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 197

no
    

Total Seats: 309

abstain
  

Total Seats: 94


Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61