Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 01:08:49
Server time: 22:51:10, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): caesar8293 | caesar8293_ | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Reform bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Religious Progressive Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4102

Description[?]:

A bill to reform our neglected religious policy's

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:19:24, October 08, 2016 CET
FromRutania Conservative Party (RCP)
ToDebating the Religious Reform bill
MessageMy party is strongly against article 1 so we will vote no.

Date18:28:11, October 08, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Religious Reform bill
MessageYeah I am also against article1

Date00:44:18, October 09, 2016 CET
FromRutanian Green Party
ToDebating the Religious Reform bill
MessageI disagree with the proposal submitted, in all it's clauses. I do not see why we would need any religious reform, given that we are a mainly secular nation.

Jackson Ruhr.
Prime Minister.

Date08:45:29, October 09, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Religious Reform bill
MessageYes what the LDP says is true

Date11:36:48, October 09, 2016 CET
FromReligious Progressive Union
ToDebating the Religious Reform bill
MessageOur nation may be secular but we have a extremely big religious population and i think we should approach them with this legislation.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 453

abstain
  

Total Seats: 107


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71