We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Review into allegations over Amhadism
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4105
Description[?]:
To ask Vote Baltusia Leader Ryan Gray to answer questions over recent allegations made in the press. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:33:21, October 13, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Mr Gray, Would you be able to report back to Congress on the "mud-slinging" between Baltusia and Kalistan over the campaigns for Seat C of the Security Council. How as it come about? Can you elaborate more on the accuracy of your source? And how has Amhadism entered the argument? For those who need more details, please see here: Ryan Gray disgusted and deeply offended at Kalistani accusations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=6922 And here: Kalistan for C responds to 'baseless' attempt to sue by failed Presidential candidate Ryan Gray http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=6921#p105543 Reverend Bartholomew Crisp Patriotic Party Leader |
Date | 15:38:04, October 13, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Thank you Mr Crisp, I have a solidly accurate source claiming that Kalistan have accused Baltusia of referring to Amhadism as a radical religion. Obviously, the source was concerned and informed is that if it was true, they would withdraw their Baltusian vote. Kalistan are going around, telling nations that Baltusia is an anti-Ahmadi nation, and I can prove that we are infact wrong. The Vote Baltusia campaign are 'confused' as to these accusations and are challenging Khalistan to prove where we said that Amhadism is radical. I am working closely with the source to try and bring justice. For more information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ryan Gray Vote Baltusia Leader |
Date | 15:38:54, October 13, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | *Kalistan are going around, telling nations that Baltusia is an Anti-Ahmadinejad nation, and I can prove that they are in fact wrong. OOC: Apologies for autocorrect |
Date | 15:39:52, October 13, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | *Anti Amhadi nation |
Date | 16:13:44, October 13, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | As president. I will not stand for Kalistan government officials going around making false accusations about Baltusia. I will have talks with their president. |
Date | 16:20:15, October 13, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Here, here. President, they will deny it though. |
Date | 15:05:10, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Mr Gray, Would any of these nations who have been approached by Kalistani officials be willing to address Congress and testify to this? It would be the only way to be sure. For the record, I represent millions of Hosians but believe all official religions should be allowed to prosper in our country. Unfortunately, the Government's position to turn its back on religious beliefs have left us exposed to this kind of criticism - even though we know it is unfounded. I told them years ago there would be repercussions to abandoning God! Reverend Crisp |
Date | 16:05:21, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Reverend Crisp, Kafuristan have made the brave, bold decision to come forward and verify that they were contacted by Kalistan. The Baltusia Minister in their government spoke to International News revealing that Kalistan had in fact told them that we were an 'Anti-Amhadi' nation. Kalistan still deny it, even though Kafuristan have come forward. I am working closely with Kafuristan with the hope that their spoken confirmation can be backed up with written evidence. Kafuristan have testified that Kalistan have contacted them, although Kalistan say they havent. I shall leave a link to the news article and feel free to work with Kafuristan to bring justice on disgusting Kalistani accusations. Thank you, Ryan Gray Vote Baltusia, Leader |
Date | 16:10:13, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=6922- Kafuristan verify that they were contacted, Baltusia celebrate the whistleblowing, Kalistan deny contact with Kafuristan, Baltusia claim they know of 'irrefutable evidence', Kalistan continue to deny contact with Kafuristan or calling Baltusia an 'Anti-Amhadi' nation. We shall just have to wait for Kafuristan to produce their evidence, which I know they have. Ryan Gray Vote Baltusia, Leader |
Date | 17:13:18, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Thank you for the update, Mr Gray. What strikes me as odd is that Kafuristan still votes for Kalistan for Seat C despite their indignation. http://classic.particracy.net/viewvariables.php?nationid=43 They are a one-party state, so it would not be difficult to change this if they so wished. So it makes me wonder what is exactly happening here. I hope you or our President can persuade Kalifuristani President Faris to send a representative here as soon as possible to bring with them the written evidence that has been mentioned. Until that time our party will remain open-minded and requests the President shows some restraint. Reverend Crisp. |
Date | 18:35:51, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | The campaign is restoring Kafuristans vote back to baltusia and evidence shall be presented shortly. |
Date | 22:10:50, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review into allegations over Amhadism |
Message | Kafuristan have pulled out of publishing evidence and have voted for Kalistan. I am absolutely gutted. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 317 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 383 |
Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |