We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill for freedom
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Republican Alliance (NRA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4106
Description[?]:
| A bill to liberalize drugs and more |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning industrial hemp.
Old value:: There are no regulations on industrial hemp.
Current: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Proposed: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:05:04, October 14, 2016 CET | From |  Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Bill for freedom |
| Message | Freedom to be shot. |
| Date | 11:51:56, October 14, 2016 CET | From | National Republican Alliance (NRA) | To | Debating the Bill for freedom |
| Message | No the freedom to carry what you want when you want. Our people want freedom and the only thing we should do id obey and give it to them. |
| Date | 19:42:21, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Bill for freedom |
| Message | As long as background checks are maintained on who can own weaponary, I am in favor of this policy. Jackson Ruhr Chairman of the LDP. |
| Date | 19:45:19, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Bill for freedom |
| Message | A redaction. Seeing as we do not currently enforce background vhecks om weaponary, and that this would allow ANY weapons to be owned, we are firmly AGAINST. If background checks were implemented in exchange for this policy, then we could support it. Jackson Ruhr. Chairman of the LDP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 137 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 363 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 100 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "There is no problem that cannot be solved with diplomacy or debate. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not need a gun, but a direct ride to a mental health clinic." - Ascentio Cartaginese, former Istalian politician |