We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Racial Equality Act of 4105
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussische Hosianer Bund
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4106
Description[?]:
An act to ensure the equality of all citizens and to remove race from being considered by the government in the provision of services and in the implementation of federal law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Interracial sex is completely illegal.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is legal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: All government owned public amenities are segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Government owned amenities are not segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:07:38, October 14, 2016 CET | From | Große Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten | To | Debating the Racial Equality Act of 4105 |
Message | Herr Speaker, Our party is strictly opposed to article 1! Jürgen Dallor Führer of the DDP Minister of Internal Affairs of Darnussia |
Date | 09:57:34, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Liberale Partij der Vrijheid | To | Debating the Racial Equality Act of 4105 |
Message | Herr Jürgen, Why is the DDP so against other races? Would the DDP like it if the Dundorfer were as discriminated as the other races? Would they? Of course they wouldn't. Everyone should have the right to be with everyone. Racial seggregation is a bad thing. |
Date | 12:47:37, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Große Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten | To | Debating the Racial Equality Act of 4105 |
Message | Herr Speaker, First of all, why is the LPV adressing me directly instead of talking to the speaker? And please don't say Jürgen, for you it's Herr Dallor. Our party is convinced of the superiority of the Dundorfian people. That is part of our program, even the name of our party says |
Date | 12:48:05, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Große Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten | To | Debating the Racial Equality Act of 4105 |
Message | Says it* |
Date | 07:22:17, October 17, 2016 CET | From | Liberale Partij der Vrijheid | To | Debating the Racial Equality Act of 4105 |
Message | Sir, with all you respect, we are adressing you directly, because you deem it necessary to segregate people and establish high tensions, which the LPV hates. The speaker is right, no question possible, and the dundorfer dominanz is a very controversial and disputed thing in most of our population. Honestly, we personally think that the DDP are rascist bigots and spies from dundorf who wants nothing more than the collapse of the Darnussian Federation. That is right, the Darnussian Federation, not the Großreich Dundorf. What dundorf does or doesn't do is not in our best priority. We are free, we are strong, we are proud. If herr Jürgen deems dundorf so superior and good, we advise him to instead of trying to take away our freedom and religion to move to Dundorf instead and continue his tyranical ideology there. Hermann Jöhner |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 60 | ||
no | Total Seats: 109 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 130 |
Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
Random quote: "You cannot open a book without learning something." - Confucius |