We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Große Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4106
Description[?]:
| Our party thinks that the military industry is an industry which has a big potential to harm our states interests. The state should control it absolutely to increase the effectiveness of our army and to ensure it serves only the security of Darnussia. Darnussia, its competent military and government are able to decide when a nuclear strike is needed to guarantee our nations independence. Following this bill nuclear attacks are only possible as an retaliation strike. We made a compromise in advance here. We also think that according to our laws on racial segregation commanding positions shoul only be held by Dundorfians. Karl Kolben Minister of Defense of Darnussia |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:55:16, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Liberale Partij der Vrijheid | To | Debating the Military Reforms |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree with article two and three, however we must ask why candidates must be of a certain race/religion to hold a position in command? Isn't that again a rascist and anti republican value? Everybody should have the right to have a shot at a position of command |
| Date | 12:39:26, October 15, 2016 CET | From | Große Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten | To | Debating the Military Reforms |
| Message | Herr Speaker, We agree that this article is highly discussable and for the sake of the other articles we will movie it to another bill. Karl Kolben |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 109 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 60 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 130 |
| Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
| Random quote: "Africa is poor because its investors and its creditors are unspeakably rich" - Naomi Klein |