Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:53:39
Server time: 18:06:20, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | Icetead | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Appendix to Military Allowance Law

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2183

Description[?]:

We should take further precautions to avoid future conflict. In peacetime we can have resolutions telling our stance on nuclear weapon, but we must still have the possibility to enforce our right as nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:41:55, February 01, 2006 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageSupport.

Date21:42:11, February 01, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageExplain the cost effectiveness of nuclear weaponry and how their massive cost can be paid for?

Date21:42:37, February 01, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageOOC - Just realised how much like an exam question that sounded like :-)

Date22:26:00, February 01, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageInternational strife has eased greatly since you were gone, L-PU. We strongly urge you to change your mind.

Date23:34:42, February 01, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageThere is no requirement for nuclear weapons. They are not cost effective nor are they a decent means of protection. They are a weapon of last resort and the money could be much better spent in researching technologies to enhance our nuclear protection methods (which can also be exported at high profit for ourselves) than on the cost of constructing and maintenance of nuclear arms.

Date23:35:55, February 08, 2006 CET
FromCapitalizt Party
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
MessageI'd support Article 1 but not 2. Maybe...

Date16:00:44, February 09, 2006 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
Messageto CAP: This is a very important meassure to protect our borders and the population of Hobrazia. You're ally L-PU is also in favourt of this proposal.

Date20:36:33, February 09, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Appendix to Military Allowance Law
Message"This is a very important meassure to protect our borders and the population of Hobrazia" - Against a non-existant threat.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 114

no
    

Total Seats: 170

abstain
  

Total Seats: 116


Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

Random quote: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79