Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 01:49:37
Server time: 18:10:22, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | Mity1 | SE33 | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]

Details

Submitted by[?]: Baltusian International Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4109

Description[?]:

Arbitrator: The Honorable Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Jon Robertson. [Democratic Conservative Party]

Plaintiff: Mr. Christopher Jacobs. [Progressive Party]

Defendant: General. Tamara Robson. [Radical Military Party]

Claim(s):
Defamation including:
- Libel,
- Slander.

Procedure:
1.) The Plaintiff will put forth his evidence for the arbitrator to review.
2.) The Plaintiff will make his case.
2.) The Defendant will have to opportunity to scrutinize the case of the Plaintiff.
3.) The Plaintiff will have an opportunity to respond to the scrutiny of his case.
4.) This shall repeat until the Plaintiff rests his case.
5.) The arbitrator shall decide the outcome of the case either by awarding damages to the Plaintiff or dismissing the claim.

Rules and Etiquette:
- The arbitrator must be addressed as "your Honor".
- The defendant, plaintiff and any witnesses must swear on oath that they shall tell the truth and only the truth.

Relevant Associated Precedent:

N/A

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:22:44, October 21, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageWould the Plaintiff please stand to put forth his evidence for me to review.

Jon Robertson
Chief Justice

Date00:03:34, October 22, 2016 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Liberal
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageHello, your honor. The Radical Military Party has mad up lies about me
-corruption
-involvement in the assassination of a member of our party
-misuse of official position.

Date00:04:15, October 22, 2016 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Liberal
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageYour honor The radical military party cannot prove this therefore we are here now.

Date22:03:01, October 22, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageThankyou Mr Jacobs, I accept the assumpted evidence and case. I shall now ask the Defendant to present their opposition.

Judge

Date12:39:17, October 23, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageIf the defendant is going to remain silent I shall have to move to the outcome of this case.

Date15:12:40, October 23, 2016 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageConsidering the defendant has reminded silent I have no other option other than to go ahead with my verdict.

For the claim(s) of

Defamation including:
Libel,
Slander

I award the plaintiff 75,000 BLD in reputational damages.

This must be paid or else the defendant could face serious action.

Jon Robertson
Chief Justice





Date02:43:24, October 24, 2016 CET
From/
ToDebating the Supreme Court, Civil: Jacobs v Robson [4108]
MessageWe will pay next month.

General Tamara Robson, leader of Radical Military Party.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 287

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 413


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

    Random quote: "Law is mind without reason." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 53