Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 00:17:59
Server time: 23:42:00, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Augustus Zardus | JourneyJak | Paulo Nogueira | SE33 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administration Bill 4112

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationale Partei des Volkes

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4113

Description[?]:

-

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:52:04, October 29, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageHerr Speaker,

We worry about this dangerous proposal. Patriotism to our nation is one thing, but there are many people who oppose military intervention and wars, even in non-combatant roles, they are still supporting a cause that they might morally object to, either through religion, ideology or just their morals in general. We urge the DSU especially to reconsider their support for this reform.

Ken Knochen, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition

Date15:40:42, October 29, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageHerr Speaker,

We applaud the members of the DSU for taking our position into account and changing their minds by opposing this unfair bill.

Ken Knochen, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition

Date15:45:49, October 29, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageMr. Speaker,

after further analysis and disscusion in the party we have deicded to reject our support for this bill.

Angela Schultz, DSU leader.

Date16:23:03, October 29, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageMr. Knochen,

main reason we've decided to withdraw support is lack of justification from the NPdV, we thinkg this solution has its pros and cons and they must be thoroughly discussed and debated. But at this point there is no point in discussion when the major party is silent during bill presentation.

Angela Schultz, DSU Leader

Date17:07:11, October 29, 2016 CET
FromNationale Partei des Volkes
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageHerr Knochen,

I'm not sitting here 24/7 and I also have 7 bills and that means 7 objections to answer. My party thinks that a person should always support his country, even if it means working in a factory (that's also a non-combatant role).

Ferdinand von Braun (NPdV) - State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic

Date17:12:33, October 29, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Administration Bill 4112
MessageState Chancellor,

We strongly disagree. A person should be free to not support their country, part of what makes a nation great is to allow for people to disagree on matters. It is counter constructive to force people into supporting a cause they may disagree with, it will make discontent and rebellion rise.

Paula Fürst, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 169

no
    

Total Seats: 331

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

    Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57