We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to the People Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4114
Description[?]:
| TBD |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Current: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Proposed: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: Local governments regulate the recognition of foreign marriages.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on inheritance
Old value:: There are no regulated inheritance laws, inheritance is only regulated by the will of deceased.
Current: There is a regulated inheritance law, private regulation of inheritance is allowed but also regulated.
Proposed: There is a regulated inheritance law, private regulation of inheritance is allowed but also regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:45:50, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Beluzian Traditional Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | The Traditional Party would consider supporting this bill if amendments were made. Article 4 invites utter degeneracy and must be removed. There is no demand for this article and it only serves to further damage society. Beastiality is a perversion and we must not allow it to become the norm. In terms of Article 3, the Traditional Party would need details on the proposed regulations on inheritance law before we supported it. All in all, if Article 4 is removed and if the government can provide clarity on the regulations referred to in Article 3, we would be likely to support the Freedom to the People Act. |
| Date | 04:57:08, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | The new rules aim to ease succession across Terra by giving individuals the chance to opt either for the law of the country of their nationality or their last habitual residence to be applicable to their inheritance across Terra. The default position will mean the law of the country where someone is a habitual resident when they die governs succession to their estate as a whole. |
| Date | 05:06:54, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | For private inheritance law regulation, the Government will regulate the wills of the deceased (nobility) to make sure that their estates are not inherited to other Dukes, Earls, Count with similar ancestry in other nations, but only to relatives within that Duke's family |
| Date | 05:08:04, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | That will ensure that the estate will be kept under the Beluzian government's control and not under the control of another nation (which might lead to negligence by that nation on the property) |
| Date | 10:03:53, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Beluz Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | What is the point of article 1? No person should be required to serve any time in the military. |
| Date | 10:24:12, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | Do you understand what the word exempted means? People are allowed to opt out of the fighting part of the military, but they cannot opt out of non-fighting (peaceful) roles. |
| Date | 20:28:02, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Beluzian Communist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | We will support this bill. |
| Date | 01:24:36, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Beluz Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Freedom to the People Act |
| Message | Mr speaker, We will oppose these proposals. It should be a person's choice to serve in ANY section of the Armed Forces. Be that front-line or behind the lines. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 471 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 129 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
| Random quote: "Conservatism, however, is too often a welcome excuse for lazy minds, loath to adapt themselves to fast changing conditions." - Sigmund Freud |