Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:53:59
Server time: 02:06:00, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4117

Description[?]:

A bill designed to advocate for the large number of fiscally conservative and socially liberal people of Gaduridos, in response to the leftist, if not communist, movement that is dangerously taking place.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:07:03, November 04, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageAgain? You already had your platform defeated this term. But sure, it would be a pleasure voting against it a second time.

Date09:36:03, November 04, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageWe urge the UFL not to support this bill, as every bit of it is destructive. Free trade is the only thing you agreed on, so here are a few examples of why this isn't good:

- Proposed: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively large salary. - How is this free trade?

- Proposed: Criminals released from jail are allowed to vote after a certain period of time. - How is this free trade?

- Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 60
Current: 60
Proposed: 68 - How is this free trade?

May I also remind you that the UFL voted in favor of some of these reforns. For example, the bill we presented to lower tge salaries of members of parliament.

Date22:49:06, November 04, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: I'm sorry if this annoys you guys, but the positions of my party on my party page do not reflect my ideology (i.e. it says regulator leaning but, as you know, am definitely more free market). I am voting on such monumental platforms in order to shape my party's ideology.

Date23:02:29, November 04, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: I appreciate you trying to explain this, but maybe try to use proposals that haven't been voted this term?
I mean, you've been around longer than me, and you should already know that these things take time xD at the moment I'm trying to get my visibility to excellent on all political positions, but I don't think repeating proposals is the way to go xD

Date23:13:08, November 04, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: I appreciate you trying to explain this, but maybe try to use proposals that haven't been voted this term?
I mean, you've been around longer than me, and you should already know that these things take time xD at the moment I'm trying to get my visibility to excellent on all political positions, but I don't think repeating proposals is the way to go xD

Date00:17:02, November 06, 2016 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageThis is a huge step back and also a proposal that failed not long ago. Of course it will fail again.

Date07:50:08, November 07, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: Repeat proposals are the way to go, it's how the mechanics of the game work. Bills have to go through and your vote has to be recorded and factored into the game's algorithm. The only way to change leaning or gain visibility is by voting on proposals and having them be processed by having the bill either won or defeated.

Date15:04:41, November 07, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: You're right, repeat proposals are a game mechanic. But I would say realism is an essencial part of the game, and it doesn't seem very realistic to repeat the same 40 articles twice in the same bill, twice in the same term.

Date14:54:15, November 09, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Platform in Response to Leftist Agenda
MessageOOC: Point taken, understood. I actually agree.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 48

no
   

Total Seats: 109

abstain
   

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The Religious Right dislikes both abortions and homosexuality. But who has fewer abortions than gays?" - George Carlin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 267