Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:01:17
Server time: 13:58:42, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): albaniansunited | itsjustgav | JJOXICO | LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Goods and Services Tax

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Farmers' Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2180

Description[?]:

An increase on consumption tax means people can receive personal tax cuts, and will ultimately result in an increase in overall tax intake as people are able to spend more.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:31:38, February 02, 2006 CET
FromJudean People's Front
ToDebating the Goods and Services Tax
Messagenaaawwwww.

Sales taxes are nasty... Plus, we dont need any additional funding for government

Date16:00:21, February 02, 2006 CET
FromThe party formerly known as Likud
ToDebating the Goods and Services Tax
MessageI would've agreed on luxury tax...but definitely not essential goods!

Date16:56:33, February 02, 2006 CET
FromThe Underworld Party
ToDebating the Goods and Services Tax
MessageSame as likud. Agree on luxury tax, but not on essential goods.

Date22:48:23, February 02, 2006 CET
FromJudean People's Front
ToDebating the Goods and Services Tax
MessageNFP is trying to change our tax structure from income based to VAT based.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 190

no
    

Total Seats: 203

abstain
  

Total Seats: 87


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Any system that takes responsibility away from people, dehumanises them." - Author Unknown

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54