We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4116
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, I think it's time the best time to change the current law which allow us to use our nuclear weaponry stockpile as a response to any form of attack. I believe and I think that milions of our people think that this solution is not a good thing. Ministry of Defence and its board of experts have created a proposal which put a limit to our possibilites of nuclear weaponry use. I am proud to present the proposal which will allow our military to use a nuclear weapon only as a answer to a nuclear attack against us or our allies. Article 1a is about Mutually assured destruction which predicts a full-scale attack as a response to nuclear attack directed at our territory. Antoinette Wellner-Tesla, Defence Minister, DSU |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:09:30, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Dorvisch Soziale Union is stunned by the totally opposed approach for rational, responsible and needed reforms and governumental proposals. I wonder how would DLSP if we had to ban pedophilia? Would they oppose it? Angela Schultz, DSU leader. |
| Date | 20:47:16, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115 |
| Message | Herr Speaker, In the interests of avoiding nuclear war, we think this is a necessary reform. However we would like to make an amendment in the future to change it so nuclear weapons can be used in heinous attacks such as devastating chemical and biological warfare. Paula Fürst, State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic |
| Date | 20:49:16, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115 |
| Message | Herr Schultz, I would like to say I wholeheartedly agree with my college the State Chancellor, but I think it's necessary to point out it was a rather over exaggerated and rude slur to insinuate the opposition would oppose banning paedophilia, and think it calls for an apology. Olivia Grabner, Internal Affairs Minister |
| Date | 21:12:55, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115 |
| Message | Maddam Speaker, Mrs. Grabner, Members of the Staatsrat, I may have used the words under the pressure of my emotions and I would like to deeply appologize members of the DLSP if those word offended them. In compensation I will donate my three-month salary to 'Fight with Social Exclusion Fund". Angela Schultz, DSU leader. |
| Date | 04:00:22, November 06, 2016 CET | From | Dorvisch Liberal Sozialistische Partei | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Usage Reform of June 4115 |
| Message | Schultz What may seem rational to you may not be for someone else. However, I am sure that most of us would agree that pedophilia is wrong. I cannot speak for the rest of my party members, as I can understand why they would be angry at your insult, but I will forgive you for what you said. Machiel Lovink, Präsident der Liberal Sozialistische Partei |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 324 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 176 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr. |