We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of May 4120
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4121
Description[?]:
We find it ridiculous that our nation focuses more on building bombs than curing cancer. We need to dismantle our military empire capabilities and work peacefully with all. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 0 SOL | 30,000,000 SOL | 30,000,000 SOL |
Foreign Affairs | 0 SOL | 10,000,000,000 SOL | 10,000,000,000 SOL |
Internal Affairs | 0 SOL | 12,000,000,000 SOL | 12,000,000,000 SOL |
Finance | 0 SOL | 10,000,000,000 SOL | 10,000,000,000 SOL |
Defence | 0 SOL | 80,000,000,000 SOL | 50,000,000,000 SOL |
Justice | 0 SOL | 52,000,000,000 SOL | 52,000,000,000 SOL |
Infrastructure and Transport | 0 SOL | 70,000,000,000 SOL | 70,000,000,000 SOL |
Health and Social Services | 0 SOL | 105,000,000,000 SOL | 105,000,000,000 SOL |
Education and Culture | 0 SOL | 130,000,000,000 SOL | 130,000,000,000 SOL |
Science and Technology | 0 SOL | 30,000,000,000 SOL | 52,000,000,000 SOL |
Food and Agriculture | 0 SOL | 12,000,000,000 SOL | 15,000,000,000 SOL |
Environment and Tourism | 0 SOL | 20,000,000,000 SOL | 20,000,000,000 SOL |
Trade and Industry | 0 SOL | 16,000,000,000 SOL | 16,000,000,000 SOL |
Total | 0 SOL | 547,030,000,000 SOL | 542,030,000,000 SOL |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:09:46, November 14, 2016 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | I support downsizing the military budget |
Date | 19:55:29, November 14, 2016 CET | From | Party of the Democratic Revolution | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | Cutting the military so low would be disastrous for our defence. Even by our old standards, this is too much to cut. |
Date | 20:39:24, November 14, 2016 CET | From | Social-Democratic Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | the militairy has been overflooded with money long enough. |
Date | 20:45:04, November 14, 2016 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | Our military will still be almost 10% of the budget. This is a moderate cut in our view. |
Date | 00:09:21, November 15, 2016 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | Since the passage of our National Defence Industries Act, the government has offloaded half of its armaments industries to private companies without adjusting the budget accordingly. Therefore, we feel this bill adequately reflects this change. It does not spread the money to where we think best, but it is a step in the right direction. |
Date | 00:13:31, November 15, 2016 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Budget proposal of May 4120 |
Message | Since this bill takes 30 billion from Defence and allocates 25 billion, we propose we use the remaining 5 billion to go toward our country's Infrastructure and Transport. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 491 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 259 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |