We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Border Protection Laws
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4121
Description[?]:
| To tighten up our borders following the infiltration of foreign terrorists into Baltusia |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Current: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Proposed: Only those born in this country or to nationals receive nationality.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Current: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Proposed: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:33:01, November 15, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the National Border Protection Laws |
| Message | Madam President, Members of Congress, As Home Secretary it is my duty to update this house on issues of domestic law and order. It is quite clear that the relaxing of effective police laws is having an impact on our country. The pro-life violent riots are a testament to that. However my real issue is that RABA was never completely destroyed and have now been encouraged to carry on the fight, particularly in the borderlands of our nation. Furthermore, according to our latest intelligence, the radical left terror organisation is now receiving most of its funding from outside this country and we also believe that there is a growing number of people arriving in this country coming to fight for them. They are taking advantage of our relaxed nationality, asylum, or work visa laws. I would therefore propose laws to cut off this foreign help - both funding and manpower - with a bill to step up security on our borders and take a firm hand with those who try to arrive here by the back door and cause havoc. In this way we can end the RABA threat once and for all. Once again if these effective laws are allowed to run their full course the threat will be dealt with and then we can repeal them. Xander Fisk, Home Secretary |
| Date | 14:16:32, November 15, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the National Border Protection Laws |
| Message | I agree with 2 and 3. But 1 absolutely not. |
| Date | 14:35:23, November 15, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the National Border Protection Laws |
| Message | their is no threat from the RABA this is to extreme |
| Date | 15:27:24, November 15, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the National Border Protection Laws |
| Message | RAC Party - on the contrary, our intelligence shows that RABA is emerging again. Perhaps if you had not given them a platform in the first place we would not be where we are now. The relaxation of police laws has certainly not helped either, and this foreign support must be quashed before the threat grows to big to deal with. Progressive Party - We only see all three articles as a temporary measure. Once the threat has been dealt with we would look to repeal. Again this would not have been necessary if we had been given the chance to finish the job we started, but hand wringing liberals start to call us "oppressive" and your party listens to them. Xander Fisk, Home Secretary |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 308 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 392 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: "Isn't it about time that the US government stop supporting dictatorships and avaricious oligarchies with our tax monies, munitions, and diplomacy?" - Ralph Nader |