We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito dei Democratici Istaliani
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4124
Description[?]:
| Mario Giuliotti, Presidente della Repubblica Istaliana: "I have to show you this message from te President of Kalistan: -Greetings, As mentioned (here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=6914&start=10#p107115) Kalistan intends to send ships to Saridan in order to help slaves flee the nation. We will require naval support in order to ensure Saridanese forces do not attempt to attack our ships, is there any chance that Istalia could help with this? -Sophia Conti, President of the Republic (Kalistan)- Should Istalia help Kalistan or not? I ask you this question |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:45:29, November 19, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | Giorgio Accorsi, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri: "Mr President, After the debate in the Security Council and in the General Assembly (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=491954) the Presidency of the Council contacted Kalistan concerned about a Saridanese reaction against the Kalistani ships. President Conti would create a multinational task to defend its ships, specifically to act as a deterrent for Saridan, which would not risk to start an escalation against half Terra. Currently Mr President, Kalistan is one of the most powerful friend nations of istalia. I think this could be a great opportunity to tighten even further the relations with Kalistan and show our determination and capability on the international arena. Our Multipurpose frigate are perfect to offer an effective contribution to the task force having our ships anti-aircraft warfare, anti-ballistic missile and surface attack capabilities. I will procede to demend to the Kalistani Government its idea on the dimension of the task force, so we will can take the adeguate decision especially on the entity of our contribution. When the government will have more info on the matter, we will submit to the parliament the decision to parecipate to this multinational task, a mission, I would remember, organizate to bring aid and soccurs to persons who are denied the most basic human rights. Thank you" |
| Date | 12:52:22, November 20, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | Giorgio Accorsi, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri: "Mr President, Hon. Parliament, I exchange messages with the President Conti of Kalistan. Here my response and the proposal for the Istalian contingent in the task force: [ I think it would be appropriate to present to the Security Council the proposed initiative of your government Mrs President. To promote the influence and the decisivity of the World Congress on Terra, we must be the first to respect the Organization and its institutions and procedures. Given the current composition of the Security Council I think we will not have problem to have the endorsement of the Security Council. And I would say you another think: In few months Istalia will be capable to deploy its new major naval unit, an Aircraft Carrier (http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4118&start=110#p107053). I thought Istalia would can offer a contingent formed by this Aircraft Carrier, a missilistic destroyer "Orizzonti" class (OCC: Horizon), a missilistic destroyer "Durante De Pennoni" class (OOC: Durand De La Pen) and two of the already cited multipurpose frigate "Intrepido" class (OOC: FREMM). ] Istalia contingent could be one of the main guarantors of the safety of passenger ships in the task force. Thank you" |
| Date | 15:31:30, November 20, 2016 CET | From | Partito del Patriota d'Istalia | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | We support this |
| Date | 09:50:53, November 21, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | Giorgio Accorsi, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri: We would shows to the Parliament the last decisions take by the criminal government of Saridan: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4320&p=107167&hilit=saridan#p107167 And then the debate in the Security Council: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=6913&p=107263#p107263 WE HAVE TO MOVE |
| Date | 11:35:35, November 21, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | Ambassador Fulgi: "Update from the Security Council: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=6913&start=20#p107263 THE SITUATION IN SARIDAN IS TERRIBLE!!! |
| Date | 13:49:15, November 21, 2016 CET | From | Partito dei Democratici Istaliani | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | Mario Giuliotti, Presidente della Repubblica Istaliana: "I and my party approve this support to Kalistan. Seen the critical situation in Saridan, we have to support them now to stop the criminal government. I hope that all parties will approve." |
| Date | 14:09:51, November 21, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | OOC: please, can you start the vote for this bill? Thank you. I think all the players here agree with this! |
| Date | 15:49:02, November 21, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Saridan Crisis RP Authorization bill |
| Message | OOC: To pass this resolution it's necessary that is approved by a 2/3rds majority of all players with seats (not just those with seats who vote) and over 50% of the seats in the legislature. from the game rules: "This bill must specify the necessary and possible consequences of the role-play event, as well as a clause that deals with the eventuality of one or more players becoming absent for more than a specified time, and how such an absence is to be interpreted in in-game terms." I think that conseguences for the moment, inside the country, there will be not. Only international tension increase. For the moment I'm following the forum and the role play, for any clarification you can ask me. I don't think will be necessary specify something if some one of us become inactive. I don't think to become inactive in the next days or months (real time obviously), as Nationmaster I can assure a continuity. I hope all the players will support this RP, it's a way to increase also the role play in the game. And I invite all the players to partecipate. (you can present question on the RP, you can act as internal opponent on some dispositions, you can work against the government with a party in other nation with which Istalia could become opponent, ecc...) Thank you |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 406 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 199 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "I worked at a factory owned by Germans, at coal pits owned by Frenchmen, and at a chemical plant owned by Belgians. There I discovered something about capitalists. They are all alike, whatever the nationality. All they wanted from me was the most work for the least money that kept me alive. So I became a communist." - Nikita Khrushchev |