Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5470
Next month in: 00:25:36
Server time: 11:34:23, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Caoimhean | TH081 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform Act (2180)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Nationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2184

Description[?]:

Hobrazia is limiting itself far too much with it's military. If other nations are constructing and experimenting with chemical and biological weapons then why should we allow ourselves to fall behind in the technology and later be held to ransom by our enemies that are fully equiped. The same applies to nuclear weapons. I am not saying we should build up stockpiles of WMD's but we should at least let it be known that we do have the capability to build them AND the strength and will to use them if needs be.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:09:55, February 03, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageHell no.

Date22:41:06, February 03, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageNot it the currently peaceful state of Terra

Date14:06:29, February 06, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageThis isn't any sort of declaration of war. We are not seen as a rogue/militaristic state so there should be no problems anywhere with our RIGHT to construct and store weapons there is nothing in the bill to suggest that any will be constructed but only that we can when the need arises.

Date19:31:22, February 06, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
Message"there is nothing in the bill to suggest that any will be constructed but only that we can when the need arises." - Do you have any idea of the devoipment time for nucalear weaponry? By the time we construct them the situtation would have develop beyond their deterring effect. In a war situation we need the funds to build up our conventional forces not waste on nuclear weapons that will never be used.

Date16:53:29, February 07, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageWhy should they never be used?

Date19:49:17, February 07, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageMAD:-
We nuke someone
They nuke us back (or their allies do so)

Date12:55:16, February 08, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act (2180)
MessageOnly if they or their allies have a nuclear capability. And also would what you just said not be the best argument for having a nuclear deterrant, nobody would be mad enough to nuke a nation who could nuke them back.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 114

no
    

Total Seats: 170

abstain
  

Total Seats: 116


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "God creates men, but they choose each other." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63