We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapon Control Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Northern Light
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2181
Description[?]:
We don't feel the need to be shot sixteen times by a old man who belives we are some kind of nazi spy... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Current: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Proposed: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:14:44, February 03, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | For #1, we prefer to allow weapons only to who use it for profession. |
Date | 22:33:36, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | Great Idea ! |
Date | 22:38:46, February 03, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | Thank you. |
Date | 08:21:16, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | We refer our friends and colleagues to Amendment II of Constitution of the former United States of America and remind those interested in liberty (and they know who they are) of the brief existence of this Republic subsequently. http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html |
Date | 11:15:45, February 04, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | We refer also to you that US is one of the first country for the rate killed by firearms/population. Not all the liberties are right, IOHO. |
Date | 15:07:16, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | ooc: actually its not the first, get your facts right, gun crime is far more prevalent in Brazil and South Africa than the US.. So why is it you think abortion is a good liberty to have, but having the ability to defend yourself is a bad liberty? |
Date | 16:43:30, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | Because...you know..the two things have nothing in common? Look at the dictionary. |
Date | 16:50:34, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | er, abortion kills babies, and you propose that guns are bad, because they kill. So killing doesn't have the same meaning? Interesting. |
Date | 20:22:46, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | Anyway, I'm not sure why a self-professed candidate for dictator would mind a few people dying, eh? Oh, you only want the police to do the killing? hmmm |
Date | 21:56:00, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | The opening statementin the description makes no sense. You are only going to get shot as a nazi spy if you break into the old mans home, which surely is fair? |
Date | 00:59:24, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | If you knew my neighbors, you wouldn't say that... |
Date | 06:59:08, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | "We don't feel the need to be shot sixteen times by a old man who belives we are some kind of nazi spy..." None of our supporters feel that they are likely to be mistaken for a Nazi spy . . . |
Date | 07:00:53, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | And yes, IF article 1 is true THEN article 2 is redundant. |
Date | 19:58:12, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Weapon Control Act |
Message | Why? Only some people can use weapons, and the types of weapons they can use is restricted. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 102 | |||
no | Total Seats: 99 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in. |
Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter |