Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:12:25
Server time: 13:47:34, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Buildup

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4126

Description[?]:

We must substantially increase the readiness of our armed forces.

I. Open homosexuality could dishearten the religious soldiers in our armed forces. It could also put off others for their own reasons. Open homosexuality should not be allowed.

II. In these troubling times, we must resort to the construction of nuclear weapons. We can no longer be caught off guard if another nuclear state attacks us.

III. Land mines are strategically important, especially for defensive warfare. However, we can't get carried away with them. This works for the time being. Should war come to us, we can revisit this.

IV. It's a scientific fact that women are not as proficient in combat as men. This isn't a sexist position, it's a fact. We can't deny women the right to patriotically serve in our armed forces, but they should not be subjected to the harsh realities of life at the front.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:39:36, November 26, 2016 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Military Buildup
Message"We cannot support a build-up of nuclear weapons that Solentia has never needed not used in the past."
Ruthander Baxillion, Unionist Leader

Date13:20:56, November 26, 2016 CET
FromSocial-Democratic Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageAmen to that

Date14:05:09, November 26, 2016 CET
FromThe Solentian Workers' Movement
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageI only agree with article 2.

Date15:09:03, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageThe Unionists would have us be unprepared in a major conflict. We can't allow that.

Date20:15:57, November 26, 2016 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Military Buildup
Message"There has been no major conflict, or indeed minor ones, involving Solentia in 2,000 years. Why would this suddenly change?"

Patch Killmillion,
Unionist Leader

Date20:20:04, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageTimes are tense. Saridan and our close ally Istalia have been at odds, with Sardian expelling the diplomats of Istalia. Also, some NGOs from Istalia were killed while in Sardian.

I would invite the Unionists to read the following from the government of Istalia- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=493322

Date22:08:13, November 26, 2016 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Military Buildup
Message"None of what he is discussing even remotely involves Solentia. As for this sudden designation of Istalia as a "close ally", we have no such delusions."

Patch Killmillion,
Shadow Foreign Secretary

Date22:13:40, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageI know it must be hard catching remembering various treaties after such a long absence, but Solentia happens to have a defensive alliance with Istalia.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=3407


Date22:14:29, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageI know it must be hard remembering various treaties after such a long absence, but Solentia happens to have a defensive alliance with Istalia.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=3407


Date23:12:25, November 26, 2016 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Military Buildup
Message"Unbending agreements between corrupt parties in Solentia and rebels in Qanzar. We await the restoration of both the Kansar dynasty and the Millennial Republic."

Patch Killmillion,
Shadow Foreign Secretary

Date23:18:59, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageI don't agree with your opinion, but I respect it. If you want to leave the alliance, I suggest you propose it to the senate so the legislature can decide.

Date23:19:53, November 26, 2016 CET
FromSUN
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageSUN is not a corrupt party.

And as to the second point; yes, maybe pigs CAN fly, Mr. Killmillion.

George Larimore
Senator, Orame

Date23:29:01, November 26, 2016 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Buildup
MessageIf you are implying that the NLP or the SUN is a corrupt party Mr. Killmillion, I would direct your attention to the most recent election results.

Max Kaiser
Senator, Fuwan

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 404

no
   

Total Seats: 55

abstain
  

Total Seats: 41


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "The trouble with communism is the communists, just as the trouble with Christianity is the Christians" - Henry Louis Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 89