Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 03:59:53
Server time: 08:00:06, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | HawkDun | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Socialist Program 4126

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito Giustizialista

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4127

Description[?]:

The Socialist Party - PRI presents the following proposals -- though not as part of the government agenda.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:17:25, November 27, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Socialist Program 4126
MessageGiorgio Accorsi, ISLP:

"my party cannot support this bill"

(OOC: I invite PS to read the parliamentary rules about the form to present a bill: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=481875)

Date21:24:42, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito del Patriota d'Istalia
ToDebating the Socialist Program 4126
MessageNo! I agree with articles 1,2 and 6 but every other article is an infringement on personal and economic freedoms. Remove at least most of articles 3,4,5 and 7 and then I will think about supporting this bill.

Date21:40:26, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Giustizialista
ToDebating the Socialist Program 4126
MessageOOC: Like I have said before, I strongly oppose the parliamentary rules that have been imposed -- I frankly think they butcher all creativity and fun of the game. The entire gameplay is about proposing bills, and I'm not going to let one thing be dictated by some obscure and -- no offense -- pointless rules. They serve no purpose but to force all players into a pattern that certain others think looks better. I ask to be exempted from the 'Parliamentary Rules of the Istalian Republic'.

Date22:35:01, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPopolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L.
ToDebating the Socialist Program 4126
MessageRP Parliamentary Rules of the Istalian Republic (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=481875):

[2] It's compulsory for the members of Parliament (players) to enter in the title of each bill that are going to propose to the Parliament the following specifications:

2.a) "D.d.l." (Disegno di legge): if it is a government's initiative bill, and therefore proposed by the government (through the parties that support him in parliament) after approval by the Council of Ministers;

2.b) "P.d.l." (Proposta di legge): in case the bill is proposed by a member of parliament individually or from his political group (in the opposition or into the government's majority).

2.c) If a D.d.l bill don't have none of two entries listed under the paragraph 2.a) and 2.b), this is considered as if it were a P.d.l. (non-governmental bill).

Date04:30:07, November 28, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Socialist Program 4126
MessageThe parliamentary rules was approved with a majority of 2/3 of the parliament when proposed. We followed all the procedures for RP, it was not imposed by anyone.
And I think that all the players that enter in a nation have to respect the existing RP. If there are problems or something that don't like all the players have the right to propose changement on the RP rules to be approved from the 2/3 of the players, not only those with seats.

But about the limitation, I can't understand how could limit the players and their creativity. You are free to propose what you want and to write in the description what you want.
What change if you write for example "P.d.l. 01/4127 - Law on the reform of the welfare" rather "Law on the reform of the welfare"?
It's a way to be more similar to italy and to be more realistic. You too proposed a bill to be more similar to italy, it isn't? I explained why in that case it's preferable an ood number, it's something which affect the game.
But this rules, especially the article about the Pdl or Ddl, do not affect the game or the creativity. Do not impose neither limitations on the arguments neither on the caracter or the history of the parties.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 219

no
    

Total Seats: 386

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 91