We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Adultery Protection Act 4129

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Fortschrittsvereinigung

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4130

Description^[?]:

We believe the right to adultery needs to be protected by law.

Proposal^[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.

Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.

Current: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.

Proposed: Adultery is legal.

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	14:57:30, December 03, 2016 CET
From	Konservative Union
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr. Speaker, "Right to adultery"? What does that even mean? What a irrational proposal? Why should we protect by law the right to extramarital sex? Let's be reasonable. Aaron Posse.

Date	15:29:06, December 03, 2016 CET
From	Fortschrittsvereinigung
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr Speaker, Why shouldn't we protect that right! It's up to people what they do, we need to protect that right. Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor

Date	15:38:11, December 03, 2016 CET
From	Konservative Union
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr. Speaker, Once again I repeat the very basic but relevant example. Protecting the adultery by law which include imposing a law which will legalise adultery, and I am not saying it should be illegal, we practicly ban thousands of people wanting to get a divorce due to being cheated on by their spouse from getting the right to do so. My another argument is based on moral grounds. What example do we give to our next generations with this law? Yes it's up to people but it doesn't mean that their right to do so which may be not ethical should be protected by law. We do not have any provision on adultery and we should keep it that way. Nobody is prosecuting anyone for cheating on his or her spouse. DSU is aggainst this proposal which clearly makes this disgusting act of adultery legal. Aaron Posse.

Date	15:42:47, December 03, 2016 CET
From	Fortschrittsvereinigung
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr Posse, People can get a divorce for any reason, a lack of love etc. Dear god man, what decade do you think we live in? As for moral grounds, it is too broad a scenario to brand "immoral", there may be some moral or rational cases for it. It's about time your party stopped acting holier than thou and got up to date! Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor

Date	19:06:18, December 03, 2016 CET
From	Konservative Union
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr. Hoehmann, maybe your party should read their proposals more accurately. Did I say that people cannot get a divorce for any other reason than adultery? I do not think so. There is no need to put another governmental stance into force by labeling adultery as legal. Current status of not recognizing adultery neither as a crime or legal act is the most reasonable. Aaron Posse.

Date	16:26:15, December 04, 2016 CET
From	Fortschrittsvereinigung
To	Debating the Adultery Protection Act 4129
Message	Mr Posse, You said "we practically ban thousands of people wanting to get a divorce due to being cheated on by their spouse from getting the right to do so". Thus my statement stands. Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 156

Total Seats: 344

abstain

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "In this age, the man who dares to think for himself and to act independently does a service to his race" - John Stuart Mill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52