Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5472
Next month in: 03:20:55
Server time: 08:39:04, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Spending Cuts Galore

Details

Submitted by[?]: Front Canrillaise

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2181

Description[?]:

Less state spending, lower taxes for the people, prosperity for all.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:34:03, February 03, 2006 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
MessageThere's no use debating since you'll all vote against.

Date23:58:45, February 03, 2006 CET
From Mouvement des Conservateurs
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
MessageWell it may surprise you but I'm going to support this, my doesn't stand behind every single article but the Act in its entity contains a strong policy.

Date01:11:52, February 04, 2006 CET
FromLutte Féministe de Libération
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
MessageThis is a very dangerous proposal, and undercuts all of the essential government programs it has been the pleasure of the Rildanorian people to guarantee to one another. We'd like to condemn you for not letting us debate such an important measure.

Date01:12:57, February 04, 2006 CET
FromLutte Féministe de Libération
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
Message"There is a free public education system and a small number of private schools, which are heavily regulated to ensure they teach adequate skills and information."

This should be the number one reason to vote against.

Date09:05:45, February 04, 2006 CET
FromDevout Ecologists Party
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
MessageOfcourse I will vote against! Sheesh.. that should be kind of obvious with eighteen possibilities. Some I could agree with, but some I am incredibly opposed to. This includes nuclear arms, education articles and weapon export. Some of the others go too far, and some others I might agree with if properly argumented.

Date20:21:44, February 04, 2006 CET
FromAdvanced Intellectual Party
ToDebating the Spending Cuts Galore
MessageI think that if this overall bill was proposed in smaller chunks bits would get through but as there are many I disagree with I have to vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 189

no
    

Total Seats: 264

abstain
  

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 147