Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5460
Next month in: 01:39:45
Server time: 06:20:14, March 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | Kiwiis | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128

Details

Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4130

Description[?]:

Plan by DSU Defence Spokesman Jacob Mitter.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:25:27, December 03, 2016 CET
From Konservative Union
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageCorrection : There is a mistake in the title it should be of course 4129.

Date15:37:43, December 03, 2016 CET
From Fortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageMr Speaker,

Your party needs to stop pushing for this dangerous proposal. If anyone within your party knew their history, they will recall the dangerous NFPP's paramilitary of the 4060s and 70s. Paramilitaries, even if heavily regulated are dangerous and wholly unnecessary!

Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor

Date15:52:30, December 03, 2016 CET
From Konservative Union
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageMr. Speaker,

let me explain what is a paramilitary organization to clear and put to end any demonization of this institution. Paramilitary organization is a body which has military structure or very simmilar but is not included as the part of the country's Military Forces. Heavy regulations do not allow paramilitaries to be connected to any political party and makes them responsible to ministry of defence and reports from its activity is presented to the MoD. Currently we have numerous paramilitary organisations not recognized by our government. I don't know if you are fammiliar with National Defence Leauge or Dorvisch Riflemen's Association.

Aaron Posse.

Date01:19:34, December 04, 2016 CET
From Sozialistische Zukunftspartei
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
Message~~Westmarkisch Zeitung~~

Sources close the Westmarkisch Linke Separatisten have confirmed their conditional support for the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128 to the Westmarkisch Zeitung. The source reported was driven by pragmatic self interest.

"There's been significant debate among the leadership on this issue. But ultimately, this proposal may see us able to acquire the necessary 'tools' for our revolutionary purposes while also providing protection from Dorvisch authorities as they wont be able to use anti-paramilitary laws to continue to stymie our organisation" the sourced was quoted as saying.

Date12:44:01, December 04, 2016 CET
From Konservative Union
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageMr. Speaker,

I repeat because the WLS leadership does not seem to understand the issue. Political movements and parties are not allowed to hold any controll over paramilitaries. Let's wait for the upcoming election so that we will be able to see the WLS weak support throughuot the country. And especially in their alleged stronghold Westmark...

Aaron Posse.

Date16:28:22, December 04, 2016 CET
From Fortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageMr Speaker,

The WLS has literally just summed up our fears about legalising paramilitaries. It is too slippery a slope to risk falling down, we urge the DSU if this proposal is ever proposed again to oppose it, for the sake of our nations security.

Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic

Date21:55:59, December 04, 2016 CET
From Konservative Union
ToDebating the Dorvisch Military Reform C of October 4128
MessageMr. Hoehmann,

we are indeed going to intorduce this proposal again because current law does not recognize the organizations I've listed above and despite the fact they are not part of our military they prepare our citizens to cmbat roles (organizations like Riflemens' Association). Heavy regulations will make them subordinate to the Ministry of Defence and The Armed Forces will be used if any insubordination will be detected.

Aaron Posse.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 221

no
  

Total Seats: 279

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: "Let's not forget that we belong to history, that history that men and women who fought before did, that history that men and women who are fighting now will do." - Tera Pisthis, former Selucian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58