We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Leone Family Act of 2180
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2182
Description[?]:
| Honorable Colleagues, Our party always has and always will be a monarchy supporter, therefor we want to propose to re-establish the Rildanor Royal Family, as known before, the Leone Family. The Leone Royal Family overview can be watched here: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/wiki/index.php/Rildanor_Royal_House Regards. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:50:51, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | NO. This is an absolute outrage that you propose to undo this crucial part of the last century's worth of reform that we have undergone. We find this proposal to be despicable, and an absolute affront to the democratic values Rildanor holds dear. Also, we consider monarchies as a whole to be an affront to every religion. They place one family above all others as the rulers, and are therefore in opposition to good Christain values of equality and faith in one power and one father. |
| Date | 03:19:48, February 04, 2006 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | Its a symbolic establishment, no higher powers or religious jurisdiction involved. |
| Date | 03:26:03, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | Symbolism has meaning though, and the meaning is what we object to. As I recall, though, the main reason we ditched the monarchy in the first place was to have more fun. We wanted to have HoS elections, and we have had them recently and they're rather fun. Furthermore, we're changing the Constitution to make the HoS and HoG one, and I think a monarchy would wreck that. Please reconsider. |
| Date | 21:27:48, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | I'll support it since my party has always been an ardent supporter of the deposed monarchy. In fact, my party defends their remaining estates from angry republicans. But I doubt you'll garner enough support. In any case, I will not mope if it doesn't pass since we're going to get the HoS and HoG merged soon. |
| Date | 10:08:40, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | Yay, monarchy! |
| Date | 11:34:04, February 06, 2006 CET | From | People's National Unity Movement (RDL) | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | This is lunacy |
| Date | 18:06:41, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the The Leone Family Act of 2180 |
| Message | We need 333 seats to pass, with the current inactivity 47 seats, this constitution change will not pass. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 293 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 160 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill |