We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Affairs Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Liberal
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4132
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports to nationals after an invasive security check.
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat A. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Kundrati
Proposed: Abstain
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:42:34, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Partido Nacional Conservador | To | Debating the International Affairs Reform |
Message | Could we ask the PPS why they think those proposals are good? We are willing to listen Fagundes, Antonio Minister of Foreign Affairs |
Date | 08:57:45, December 07, 2016 CET | From | União Democrática do Tukarali | To | Debating the International Affairs Reform |
Message | "We would especially be interested in getting any reasoning for nominating Luthori for the Security Council. Is there any reason,or is it just because the PPS likes the nation's name?" Érico Belo, leader of the UDT parliamentary party and spokesperson for Foreign Affairs and Defence |
Date | 11:14:40, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Ação Progressiva | To | Debating the International Affairs Reform |
Message | We will not support the nomination of Luthori for the security council. Luthori was once a colonial power which unleashed imperialism onto the world which resulted in the death, displacement or inhumane treatment of millions of people. They do deserve to take such a priveleged role in the world. Second, there is no reason for "intensive" security checks - this would do nothing but damage the tourism industry in the name of paranoia. - Lena Zabek Gomes, Foreign Affairs spokesperson |
Date | 13:09:02, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Partido Liberal | To | Debating the International Affairs Reform |
Message | We must secure our borders. Dangerous immigrants from dangerous countries could come to our beloved land and cause a terrible mess here. Geovanni Spinozza, Minister of Foreign Affairs |
Date | 15:09:57, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Ação Progressiva | To | Debating the International Affairs Reform |
Message | OOC: Sorry, I made a HUGE typo.. It should read "They do NOT deserve to take such a priveleged role in the world." Also, what on earth does nominating Luthori to the security council have to do with strong border controls? We should have a discussion as a country in regard to our security council nominations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 25 | |||
no | Total Seats: 58 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 34 |
Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader |