We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security Council Voting Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ação Progressiva
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4134
Description[?]:
| OOC: We should probably decide who we are going to vote for given that we have currently abstained. I think it'd be a good idea to get as big of a consensus between the parties as possible. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat A. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Kundrati
Proposed: Abstain
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat B. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Abstain
Proposed: Abstain
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat C. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Tukarali
Proposed: Abstain
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat D. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Abstain
Current: Lourenne
Proposed: Abstain
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:31:25, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Partido Liberal | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | We support it. |
| Date | 20:51:00, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Partido Nacional Conservador | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | Why should we vote for those specific nations? What are the ideia of the AA for them? Fagundes, Antonio Minister of Foreign Affairs |
| Date | 21:01:39, December 07, 2016 CET | From | Ação Progressiva | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | OOC: I don't really have specific preferences, I just wanted to discuss with others which countries people would be willing to support. |
| Date | 17:07:23, December 08, 2016 CET | From | Ação Progressiva | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | OOC: Although, to be honest, the one's I selected seem to be the most neutral and democratic of all the candidates. Does anyone object to this? I would like to put it to vote after the next election so that we're not losing out in this process. |
| Date | 19:07:22, December 09, 2016 CET | From | Partido Nacional Conservador | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | OOC: Right now, im searching for threads that show how they will act if they win, but i cant find none, but, for seat C you have proposed tukarali, what i can say about this is, we would someone to roleplay in the forums for that, just need to find who wants to do that, and if the country can reach a consensus for who will represent us. |
| Date | 12:45:22, December 12, 2016 CET | From | Ação Progressiva | To | Debating the Security Council Voting Bill |
| Message | OOC: I am tired of waiting. We should probably support this and then after doing some further research we can vote on alternatives later? It's a shame to waste our votes.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 40 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy |