We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.

Details

Submitted by^[?]: PLAK

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4224

Description^[?]:

Will make sure money is in our budget is used for more social services, consoling, and other programs. If this bill passes, money shall be set aside to fund such programs/

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	11:01:43, December 08, 2016 CET
From	Parti Républicain
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	What would the practical results of this bill be? Should it pass would it require us to present a budge increasing spending on HSS?

Date	17:38:37, December 08, 2016 CET
From	PLAK
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	The results, would be increased funding to HSS, and our official postion on such issues is to help Kanjorians with issues work through them, opening up mental health clinics and the like.

Date	17:40:15, December 08, 2016 CET
From	Parti Républicain
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	I am certain that the state Health Service already provides free counselling and mental health services and the Health Services is already extremely well funded.

Date	17:48:38, December 08, 2016 CET
From	PLAK
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	It does we admit, however, we feel that if we pool more funding into HSS, then make provisions so mental health will have its own fund, we can build specialty clinics, free of charge of course, and offer more assistance to those in crises,

Date	17:50:18, December 08, 2016 CET
From	Parti Républicain
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	We would be willing to direct the current surplus towards mental health, however we will only continue to have that surplus if the PPSK does not implement its proposed changes to sales tax.

Date	17:54:50, December 08, 2016 CET
From	PLAK
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	the sales tax is regressive. If we raise taxes on the rich, cut the sales tax, we will maintain the surplus.

Date	17:57:04, December 08, 2016 CET
From	Parti Républicain
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	The rich are already highly taxed in this country. Even if we passed a proposterous 100% tax on our wealthiest citizens it would not make up the sales tax shortfall.

Date	18:05:29, December 08, 2016 CET
From	PLAK
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	if we tax the top 3 brackets at 75% cut sales tax, increase corporation taxes, to 45%, would it not balance?

Date	18:13:45, December 08, 2016 CET
From	Parti Républicain
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	That would leave us just over 5,000,000,000 short.

Date	21:42:19, June 08, 2017 CET
From	Moderation
To	Debating the Suicide Prevention Funding Referendum.
Message	OOC: Archiving

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 0

abstain

Union Populaire Democrate (199)
The Federal Union (101)

Total Seats: 300

Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "We’ve got to stand with our North Korean allies." - Sarah Palin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56