Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5472
Next month in: 01:47:14
Server time: 18:12:45, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | ShadowSneak | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2180

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2181

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:09:30, February 04, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageLet me know what you think. I presume we all want to break the hegemony of the AC.

Date19:13:11, February 04, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageHaha, our suspicious were confirmed. You're trying to take power. Four cabinet spots? The voters didn't seem to give you much power. I doubt the LGDP party would vote one seat for them so capitalists can have 4. After all, they left the AC because there were capitalists in it.

Date19:20:47, February 04, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageI think you'll find I gave myself two.

Date19:21:07, February 04, 2006 CET
FromSocial Reform Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
Message"I presume we all want to break the hegemony of the AC."

No, you want to break from a the stability of the Aloria Coalitions. Typical of the Anti-Alorians.

Date14:49:47, February 05, 2006 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageWe always prefer to have Foreign Affairs, but this will do for the time being.

Date18:11:52, February 05, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageWe can always propose another one after this, so people get the ones they prefer. This is just to kick out the AC.

Date14:42:52, February 06, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2180
MessageOne of these cabinets would have been passed had we have had those early elections...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 270

no
  

Total Seats: 227

abstain
  

Total Seats: 53


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78