We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Reform Bill of June 4143
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4144
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, this is a new version of the bill drafted and proposed in March by KU IA spokeswoman Saskia Nikula. Tim Tancredi. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:02:55, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Bill of June 4143 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We still oppose this bill as we see it as a violation of private ownership, even if it is an improvement over the appalling previous proposal. Sara Voight, Parliamentary Leader of the Progress Party, Finance Minister. |
| Date | 12:32:24, January 01, 2017 CET | From | Liberalen Partei | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Bill of June 4143 |
| Message | We would only support eminent domain in very specific cases, so we vote yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 365 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 135 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader |