We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Corruption Removal Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leftist Unitist Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4144
Description[?]:
| As with any good, pure democracy, we as a nation should seek a path of generosity and not that of corruption. For too long our political landscape has been plagued by corruption, caused in part by the abnormal term length and the large salaries given to those in charge. A leader who leads out of the good of their heart and out of love and care for the citizens is the leader needed for our nation, and as such, the salaries for our leaders need not to be so high. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The salaries of members of parliament and/or government.
Old value:: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively large salary.
Current: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively large salary.
Proposed: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a nominal salary only.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:14:54, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Telamonian Workers' Movement (TWM) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | I agree with article 1 but article 2 no. |
| Date | 23:15:52, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Telamonian Workers' Movement (TWM) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | And ideally article 1 should be a small salary. |
| Date | 23:16:52, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | What is the issue with Article 2? Would you prefer 36? OOC: I made it so low because of the fact that this nation seems to only have two main active parties, and four years in between elections would make things boring and systematic, in my opinion |
| Date | 23:18:07, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Telamonian Workers' Movement (TWM) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | 36 would be preferable. There just needs to be enough time to get things done. |
| Date | 23:19:35, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | OOC: How to change a proposal? Sorry i am new here |
| Date | 23:21:44, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Telamonian Workers' Movement (TWM) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | OOC: just remove the article and re propose it. |
| Date | 23:26:09, December 30, 2016 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | Are all proposals satisfactory? |
| Date | 11:15:50, December 31, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | We belive that 4 years is optimal for a government and should not be changed.... |
| Date | 18:07:28, December 31, 2016 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | Why is that? As I said I'm open to debate I would just like a reason as to why 4 years is preferable to 3? |
| Date | 21:10:59, December 31, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | Because laws take a lot of time...espacially constitutional amendments which take close to 1 and a half years limiting the mandate time means limiting to amount of progress that we can achieve |
| Date | 21:57:28, December 31, 2016 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | Fair enough, if i remove this article, will you support? |
| Date | 22:49:46, December 31, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Corruption Removal Act |
| Message | Yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 400 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "Politics is all about compromises and negotiations, nothing more, nothing less." - Augusto Amadeo, former Istalian politician |