Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 00:14:27
Server time: 15:45:32, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | Dx6743 | HawkDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitution Committee

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4150

Description[?]:

This bill codifies the changes we would like to make.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:09:21, January 02, 2017 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageOur party are proud to be the first party to officially endorse and partner with the Constitution Committee and back these changes.

Matthew Burgmuller
CPoB Leader

Date20:20:34, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageWe thank Mr Burgmuller and his party for the support. We recognise his passion for the country and that he wants what's best. We hope that other parties share this love enough to follow suit.

William Horncastle,
Chief Committeman,
Constitution Committee.

Date21:32:30, January 02, 2017 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageOur party wants Baltusia to be unique and wonderful, not a carbon-copy of another nation. I urge all those who think like-minded to vote these changes down.

For Baltusia,
Morris Shephard.

Date21:34:35, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageMr Shepard,

Which nation in Terra are we "copying". We're trying to create a unique and wonderful nation. We're trying to set ourselves apart! Vote yes, we both want the same thing.

William Horncastle,
Chief Committeman,
Constitution Committee.

Date21:47:44, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageMr Shepard,

Only by creating a unique identity in the changes that we've proposed can we avert disasters like the Shah crisis. If we present ourselves as united, modern, fresh and unique, we send a message to the world that we are who we are and no one can change that.

William Horncastle,
Chief Committeman,
Constitution Committee.

Date22:01:38, January 02, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageI do not agree with this it will not work

Date22:06:37, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageWhy? What's your reasoning?

Date22:09:58, January 02, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageWell we have so many parties the national anthem is fine and many people don't trust God

Date22:12:07, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageThere's nothing wrong with having a lot of parties, it's better for democracy. The national anthem that we currently have is a relic of a bygone age that doesn't represent our nation anymore. The motto is aesthetically necessary.

We urge you to reconsider.

Date22:12:31, January 02, 2017 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageWe would be copying a OOC nation! What good is a country that can't think for itself. We have a colorful and unique culture.

For Baltusia,
Morris Shephard.

Date22:14:21, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageOOC: I'm confused, are you OOC in your criticism? Our nation is the Particracy equivalent of America. Look at our flag, look at our cultural protocol. We are undoubtedly based on the US. We need to strengthen that image.

Date22:25:39, January 02, 2017 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
Message1) I said OOC in referring to the country you just named.
2) Our country may very well be the equivalent but that doesn't mean we have to be exactly like it.

Morris Shephard.

Date22:29:09, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageOOC: We're not exactly like it in the changes I proposed for that exact reason. We should be influenced by not a copy of.

That's why the proposed anthem is not the star spangled banner.

That's why the proposed motto is not In God We Trust.

We need to be unique in our identity in terra and there is no other nation which has these qualities.


Date23:05:44, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageOkay, here's what needs to happen. If you oppose this bill, write down your biggest reasons. Also write what you would change about the bill to make it something you'd support.

Date23:30:24, January 02, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageThe purpose of the committee is not to dictate which chmages need to happen. It's to find the best change that works for all of us. Tell us why you don't like
our proposals and what you'd do instead. This isn't a unilateral process. Let's work together.

Date15:39:57, January 03, 2017 CET
FromPatriotic Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageChief Committeman Horncastle,

We thank you for your time and effort in compiling this report.

My agreements or objections to the various articles of this bill:

Article 1 - I do not wish to change the national anthem: although the Committee's new verses are indeed stirring, our party believes in the traditional lyrics of the current anthem. They are steeped in history, pride and the blood of our forefathers.

The lines...

If a foreigner may, any given day
Even attempt to subjugate Baltusia,
Let him prepare for a fatal destiny

...Were sounding in my ears as Aldegar attempted to foist a king on us!

Articles 2 and 3 - Fine.

Articles 4 and 5 are fine from the Patriotic Party's point of view if the bicameral system is something every party wishes to adopt and embraces the system previously set out by the committee, including the presidential veto rule.

OOC - Personally, I think it is ok for people who have been here for a long time but for players who dip in and out of Baltusia, the complexity may put some off and we may end up running out of fresh blood, so something to bear in mind.

Article 6- Again, whilst our party supports the connection between god and the state, we do not wish to see our country's motto changed.

Article 7- I suppose it would depend on whether we see more bald eagles flying around or lions prowling the prairies in Baltusia. Personally, I would prefer the golden eagle.


Ralph Mason
Patriotic Party Leader.


Date16:29:11, January 03, 2017 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageWe wholeheartedly agree with what the Patriotic Part has said.
OOC: For articles 4 and 5 I would like to see a test run done.

Leader of the Free Market Party,
Morris Shephard.

Date19:14:44, January 03, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageMembers of Congress,

Following the diverse feedback we have received, we will take into consideration these opinions and resubmit our proposals accordingly.

We will also submit them in the new form which we have proposed given the consensus surrounding its introduction.

We thank all members for their participation.

William Horncastle,
Chief Committeeman,
Constitution Committee.

Date19:46:28, January 03, 2017 CET
FromConstitution Committee
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
Messagehttp://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=499125

Date23:33:30, January 03, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the Constitution Committee - Proposed Changes
MessageI mean what's wrong with our current system the new idea seems to complex

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 176

no
     

Total Seats: 446

abstain
  

Total Seats: 78


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church." - Thomas Paine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 90