We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pollution Reduction Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leftist Unitist Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4150
Description[?]:
| As a way for the LUC to flex their muscles, and as well as a way to overall decrease national and global pollution, we feel the following changes are in order. As always, these are open to debate |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:15:28, January 11, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | We are a little concerned that highly restrictive regulations might lower production and jobs however we are still looking to support this bill |
| Date | 13:40:17, January 11, 2017 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | It wouldn't inherently lower production, and it would most likely increase jobs as in order to stay within the regulations, smaller businesses would have to be created in order to maximize production |
| Date | 18:01:17, January 11, 2017 CET | From | Authoritarian Party | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | "I don't believe in pollution" - Claire Pierce |
| Date | 18:20:58, January 11, 2017 CET | From | Leftist Unitist Coalition | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | How does one not believe in pollution? |
| Date | 09:16:18, January 12, 2017 CET | From | Authoritarian Party | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | "There is no proof it exists" Claire Pierce |
| Date | 11:14:57, January 12, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | İ think you mean global warming |
| Date | 11:15:21, January 12, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Alliance Party (LAP) | To | Debating the Pollution Reduction Act |
| Message | Which certainly exists |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 210 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 90 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
| Random quote: "I am a conservative to preserve all that is good in our constitution, a radical to remove all that is bad. I seek to preserve property and to respect order, and I equally decry the appeal to the passions of the many or the prejudices of the few." - Benjamin Disraeli |