Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 01:34:15
Server time: 10:25:44, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religion Act (2181)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Nationalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2183

Description[?]:

Article I: Religious institutions should be treated as companies regarding taxation. Not since the middle ages have religious institutions been exempt from paying tax on their secular possetions. For example if a church holds land and recieves rent from those lands held, why should it not pay tax on the income it recieves? The current system is out of date and biased.

Article II: All schools should not have any sort of ideology in what they teach. From personal experience I know how religious schools don't give you the same level of education in some subjects such as theology and philosophy and even in some cases science. Religion should have no part to play in the teaching of children although children should still be taught religious studies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:01:30, February 06, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
MessageWe agree wholeheartedly with article 1. A religion provides a product and so, as any other company, should pay tax on the profits of said product.

Article 2... we will consider our position and vote on advisement.

Date01:13:57, February 07, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
MessageNo and no. Religion and speech are the foremost of liberties, as such we will always seek to protect them.

Date11:51:41, February 07, 2006 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
MessageWe will support this bill.

Date14:29:10, February 07, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
Message"Religion and speech are the foremost of liberties," - Which is why we don't ban them, however religion is now a large multinational business with both political and social aims, as any other business, and so should be treated in the same way.

Date18:39:50, February 07, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
MessageTaxing a religious institutions commercial income is not infringing their libities or that of the worshipper but taxing the income they recieve outwith donations.

Date18:11:30, February 08, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
Message"however religion is now a large multinational business with both political and social aims, as any other business, and so should be treated in the same way." Thanks to capitalism, though that is not the fault of religion. If you want to correct that, then look into the heart of the problem: free enterprise.

Date15:47:19, February 09, 2006 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Religion Act (2181)
MessageReligious institutions have been making a profit since the donation of constantine. If religion wants to be a part of the secular world then it should pay it's bit into the pot like everyone else.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 160

no
    

Total Seats: 147

abstain
 

Total Seats: 93


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68