We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Guarantee Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Proletariat Revolution Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2061
Description[?]:
No one citizen of Likaton shall ever be subject to the malicious practices of dictatorial regimes. They shall never live in a state of fear and they shall retain their basic human rights. Every citizen has the right to live in and vote in a free and democratic Likaton, in which all have a voice. The only condition upon which any citizen is stripped of his or her rights, is upon being convicted of a capital crime. But, even then, they shall not be subject to any form of torture, be it psychological or physical. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:51:23, May 29, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | No |
Date | 07:48:28, May 29, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | And why? Why shouldn't people have equal rights? Why shouldn't they have a right to a progressive system? Why should they liev under the repressive thumb of the state? |
Date | 20:57:57, May 29, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | I believe the RWLP is reacting to the last part of the last clause. |
Date | 01:07:33, May 30, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | Well, they weren't clear about it. They were being very ambigeous with their all-round generic "no" response. But, nevertheless, I have changed it to ensure that torture is NOT an option. |
Date | 04:27:40, May 30, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | Perfect! No one should be subjected to torture, be it psychological or physical. |
Date | 08:43:10, May 30, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | I like that last phrase. The nice thing is, we don't say "no" to capital punishment, which will keep the right-wingers happy. (even though we do oppose it) |
Date | 10:47:50, May 31, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | Yes the last bit indeed. Ive never been a strong debater. I know im right and thats all there is to it! : P I can accept this proposal. |
Date | 16:32:17, May 31, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | THen after the election (pending the call for an earlier election passes), then we'll put this to vote. |
Date | 20:30:14, May 31, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the The Guarantee Act |
Message | We will support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 92 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 45 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Depressions and mass unemployment are not caused by the free market but by government interference in the economy." - Ludwig von Mises |