Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:06:58
Server time: 10:53:01, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hnp19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Better Beluzia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Unionist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4159

Description[?]:

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal National Committee and members of Congress have come together to make our case to the nation. The Liberal Party looks to create an economy where the private sector can thrive without hurting the rights of workers. Our country has been misguided, now is the time for a party that puts common sense first to fix it. We have already made great strides during our journey, but there will be more bruises and scars to come. The Liberal Party will proudly bear this great honor, and lead Beluzia into an age of unprecedented prosperity and freedom.

Catherine Hamilton
Congressional Leader for the Liberal Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:34:47, January 30, 2017 CET
FromNational Socialist Worker's Party (NSWP)
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageToo many legislations we simply cannot accept.....we shall oppose

Date09:47:26, January 30, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageThis seems more like a proposal for a neoliberal Beluzia instead of a progressive Beluzia

Date10:33:01, January 30, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageThese proposals will make the poor poorer and the poor more vulnerable. A move backwards to a conservative state

Date18:32:59, January 30, 2017 CET
FromUnionist Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageAnything looks "conservative" compared to the Beluzia you've created. The BRRP has created a Beluzia where everyone is kept in poverty and no one is allowed to prosper. Our proposals would allow the economy to flourish, incomes to rise, and still aid the poorest memebers of our society.

Date22:03:54, January 30, 2017 CET
FromNational Progressive Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageWhile there are minor things we agree with this, it has to many things we disagree with to allow to pass.

Date04:01:45, January 31, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageIf you think I made Beluzia conservative, then explain to me why you always have less seats than our party in Parliament. And if you think we didn't help the poor, we did. We increased spending.

Date09:54:42, January 31, 2017 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the A Better Beluzia
MessageThere are several things within this bill which we agree on, but we cannot support such wide reform. It sets a precedent we believe dangerous. It is important that we slowly reform the government rather than make sweeping changes, and perhaps we need time to debate before putting these before our parties to vote. If we were able to simply debate first, we could have come to an agreement which everybody could be satisfied with. The NSWP, while someone we do not agree with on virtually anything, at this moment, though possibly not for long, holds a huge amount of seats, as does the New Left. We have to make sure that all of these parties are on board before introducing legislation. It is frankly irresponsible to introduce so many reforms all at once, not to mention unlikely to find any success. Perhaps several of these would pass on their own, as we agree with many of the articles. But too many proposals at once can be detrimental even if they are good changes. A revolution cannot happen over night, even amongst this congress. It is a slow process, and we should ensure that it remains this way, and avoid proposing so many articles at once, as well as allowing time to properly discuss them to find something we can all agree.

Because of this, we must vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 28

no
      

Total Seats: 395

abstain
 

Total Seats: 126


Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

Random quote: "The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant." - Maximilien Robespierre

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 183