We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Preventing Unessesary disasters
Details
Submitted by[?]: Baltusian Pantian Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2182
Description[?]:
We cannot go on feuled by such a dangerous material if we will not threaten our lives with nuclear wepons what difference is a nuclear generator in thier city? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Current: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Proposed: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:51:54, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Baltusian Pantian Alliance | To | Debating the Preventing Unessesary disasters |
Message | By running these facilities we run a giant risk to the population and the land they live on, the BPA will not be the ones brought to the lynch when the first generator costs us many of our citizens. |
Date | 16:10:40, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Preventing Unessesary disasters |
Message | Modern nuclear power is the safest form of energy (excluding windpower). If you study it and do not base your arguments on your personal feelings you will see it yourself. Please do so. |
Date | 16:12:28, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Preventing Unessesary disasters |
Message | I forgot to mention that of course old reactors are a risk factor but new reactors just can't meltdown, it's impossible due to new safeguards. For example the new reactor under construction in real life Finland can even survive similar terrorist attack by jumbojets that WTC couldn't. |
Date | 17:00:18, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Libertad y Justicia | To | Debating the Preventing Unessesary disasters |
Message | There is not a shred of evidence for your claim. Even old reactors have had very, very few meltdowns. The reason the ones that did are so famous, is because they are so rare. |
Date | 03:25:10, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Preventing Unessesary disasters |
Message | And indeed even poorly maintained, old reactors only had accidents when people were being stupid. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 38 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 323 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
Random quote: "I realize that a life predicated on being obedient and taking orders is a very comfortable life indeed. Living in such a way reduces to a minimum one's need to think." - Adolf Eichmann |