We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unity Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4165
Description[?]:
To further ensure rights are enhanced to citizens of Malivia |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Current: Regulation is used to screen out only those with a previous history of child abuse.
Proposed: Regulation is used to screen out only those with a previous history of child abuse.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: Prostitution is illegal.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: Prostitution regulation decisions are left up to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:31:35, February 11, 2017 CET | From | Malivian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act |
Message | I absolutely agree! |
Date | 16:34:59, February 11, 2017 CET | From | Malivian People's Party | To | Debating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act |
Message | Could you elaborate your reasoning to include article 2? With our current legislation ( Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.) would checking to see if they have a history of child abuse not be included in the routine check-up? What you propose is, without a doubt, acceptable and makes sense. I just think the way it currently stands, we can decide the rules of adoption and there may be more reasons than just child abuse that justifies denying an applicant. If legislation was changed to the proposed, as long as you have no history of child abuse you could adopt even if we or people close to them saw legitimate reasons for them to be denied. If legislation on adoption is to remain unchanged after this bill, I propose that a document is put together explaining exactly how the Government regulates adoption. |
Date | 04:14:06, February 12, 2017 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act |
Message | the thing is, leaving such an option to local government can make adoption in various states problematic as one state can simply decide that there be no checks at all. So to eliminate that problem, ensure that national government can oversee such a policy initiative so that everyone is on the same page |
Date | 17:46:39, February 12, 2017 CET | From | Malivian People's Party | To | Debating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act |
Message | "local government can make adoption in various states problematic as one state can simply decide that there be no checks at all" - this is a great point. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 337 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 112 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." - Ronald Reagan, quoted in New York Times, 22 September 1980 |