Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 01:08:50
Server time: 06:51:09, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Unity Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4165

Description[?]:

To further ensure rights are enhanced to citizens of Malivia

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:31:35, February 11, 2017 CET
FromMalivian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act
MessageI absolutely agree!

Date16:34:59, February 11, 2017 CET
FromMalivian People's Party
ToDebating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act
MessageCould you elaborate your reasoning to include article 2?

With our current legislation ( Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.) would checking to see if they have a history of child abuse not be included in the routine check-up?

What you propose is, without a doubt, acceptable and makes sense. I just think the way it currently stands, we can decide the rules of adoption and there may be more reasons than just child abuse that justifies denying an applicant. If legislation was changed to the proposed, as long as you have no history of child abuse you could adopt even if we or people close to them saw legitimate reasons for them to be denied.

If legislation on adoption is to remain unchanged after this bill, I propose that a document is put together explaining exactly how the Government regulates adoption.

Date04:14:06, February 12, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act
Messagethe thing is, leaving such an option to local government can make adoption in various states problematic as one state can simply decide that there be no checks at all. So to eliminate that problem, ensure that national government can oversee such a policy initiative so that everyone is on the same page

Date17:46:39, February 12, 2017 CET
FromMalivian People's Party
ToDebating the Malivia Rights Administrative Amendment Act
Message"local government can make adoption in various states problematic as one state can simply decide that there be no checks at all" - this is a great point.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 337

no
  

Total Seats: 112

abstain
    

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

Random quote: "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." - Ronald Reagan, quoted in New York Times, 22 September 1980

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65