We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, June 2182
Details
Submitted by[?]: Redneck Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: February 2183
Description[?]:
| We, the Redneck Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:24:53, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | We do not care to discuss it. Straight to vote. |
| Date | 08:38:45, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | Any reason for this? I'd have thought the Tories needed more visability before we held another election. |
| Date | 12:04:36, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | Yes, from our point of view too the time is wrong for early elections, not only because we don't have enough visibility, but alos becuse of the Dundorf crisis. |
| Date | 19:11:31, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | We're going to work on the assumption that the Rednecks have the best interests of God, Emperor and fatherland at heart and vote aye. |
| Date | 20:29:34, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Shuggoth Progressive Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | I voted against this because the SPP felt that the CP did not have enough visibility yet to get an accurate vote. The CP shared this belief, but radicalized elements in certain parties decided to push the issue. The SPP would however like to thank the conservative parties for giving us more seats in the legislature! We should build a statue in your honor, or something. ;) |
| Date | 23:38:07, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | And we should thank those who backed this motion, because our votes came mainly from their voters. In fact, if you look at the statistics, the parties who opposed this eary election got more seats.... |
| Date | 09:20:01, February 09, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Call for early elections, June 2182 |
| Message | I thought the SPP went down from 211 to 201? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 414 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 252 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 84 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another, no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy." - John Smith |