Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 03:14:34
Server time: 20:45:25, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Autokrator30 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Democratic Party - Syndicalists

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 4177

Description[?]:

Arbitrator: The Honourable Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Gillian Bailey

Defendant: Wez Belushi

Charges:

abuse of power
Recruitment of Illegal organisation

Plea Hearing Procedure:

1) The Arbitrator will set out the charges that the defendant is convicted of, what they are and their maximum sentence.
1.5) The Arbitraror will inform the defendant of the advantages of an early plea at this stage.
2)The Arbitraror will ask the defendant to make their first plea.
3) The Defendant will make their first plea on their charges.
4) If a guilty plea is entered, the sentence trial will go ahead.
4.5) If a not guilty plea is entered, a trial will be announced, the jury will be called, as will the state prosecutor.
5) At the point of a not guilty plea, the judge sets out the time and date for the trial and informs the jury and prosecutor.

Rules and Etiquette

- The arbitrator must be addressed as "your Honour".

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:27:58, February 21, 2017 CET
FromGovernment of Tropica
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC ; we should wait for stun monkey confirm, but at first, glance everything seem to be in order.
I suggest a jury or three judges, RAC + SPB + Progressive. the SPB and progressive will only have to decide guilty or not guilty.

We will take the role of state prosecutor, since you are already arbitror.

Date23:29:37, February 21, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC Ok sounds good

Date23:33:50, February 21, 2017 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC: You guys should speak to the socialists because I think we are waiting for an investigation into the PSL, Governor Belisha has not yet been charged- look at the Constitutional affairs ministers statement. Btw, we had a case on paramilitaries in the past and it was a jury decision. If the socialists approve this, we should go ahead with a jury verdict.

Date23:36:44, February 21, 2017 CET
FromGovernment of Tropica
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC : before anything, we should wait for the PPB answer... because to charge governor Belisha, he has to violate the law and ignore the warning gived to him.

Date23:38:23, February 21, 2017 CET
FromBaltusian International Democratic Party
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC: Ok, so he would have to continue operating the private security firm against the warning given?

Date23:43:37, February 21, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC Ok let's wait I will take the bill down if he agrees to our demand

Date11:58:50, February 22, 2017 CET
FromPatriotic Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC - Hi guys. I am happy to RP any situation like this but let us see how the investigation pans out first as this may not be necessary. Cheers :)

Date13:12:43, February 22, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC Ok sounds good

Date21:05:03, February 22, 2017 CET
FromGovernment of Tropica
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC : if ever you decide to go with this rp, : please, send me a formal message along all proofs collected by minister of internal affairs.

Date21:39:56, February 22, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the SUPREME COURT: Criminal- State v. Belushi (Plea Hearing)
MessageOOC I will

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 611

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 89


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61