Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 01:40:54
Server time: 02:19:05, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government of National Unity May 2059

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2061

Description[?]:

We propose this government of national unity for Telamon

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:24:30, May 29, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageAm prepared to discuss this Cabinet proposal but only if the current Cabinets proposal is withdrawn

Date12:24:42, May 29, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
Messagei like it

Date13:29:28, May 29, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Nacionalnogo Progressa
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
Messagei don't like it, but i am agree.

Date19:14:46, May 29, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageThat's not the point of the cabinet proposal. The whole point is to add another option for everyone to use. Even with the new legislative options being put in, I don't feel it is enough yet. The more the better.

Date20:26:57, May 29, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageIndependents, I see your point but it just gets ridiculous if everyone proposes a different Cabinet each time - it becomes a mess. I should remain the Head of State's perogative

Date21:37:05, May 29, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageAt least i'm in it for once...

Date05:53:21, May 30, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageWell, thats our difference. I think it would be fun for everyone to propose a different cabinet.

Date13:16:53, May 31, 2005 CET
FromCorporative Tyrannical Party
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageNational Unity? I see only UCA's attempts to retain the power using noequal bargain!

Date14:52:34, May 31, 2005 CET
FromCorporative Tyrannical Party
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageAre you out of mind? Do you want to eat this dogbone?

Date15:21:04, May 31, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Government of National Unity May 2059
MessageThere seems to have been an administration error with the exemption of me from this cabinet

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 81

no
 

Total Seats: 19

abstain
   

Total Seats: 51


Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

Random quote: "I came, I saw, I conquered" - Julius Caesar

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76