Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:57:37
Server time: 01:02:22, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): DanivonX | Interstellar. | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2184

Description[?]:

Eliminating a useless treaty membership so the funding of being active in this organisation may be distributed elsewhere in our diplomatic affairs.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:48:41, February 09, 2006 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageWe say....withdraw from the Communists!

Date00:40:16, February 10, 2006 CET
FromUnited & Green Democrats
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageCould the Communist Party and the DSP please outline their objections to the treaty?

Date05:57:31, February 10, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessagePut money in maintaining this worthless treaty elsewhere.

Date01:25:15, February 11, 2006 CET
FromUnited & Green Democrats
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageYou haven't really explained why this treaty is bad; you've just repeated what you have already said. What about the treaty do you belive negatively affects Kafuristan? What's different from it to other treaties?

Date01:56:52, February 11, 2006 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageHow does this affect costs associated to it?

Date07:02:23, February 11, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageHow? Firstly, ink. Every time we run our annual reviews, printing the long title runs our printers dry.

How else? We put a portion of money into monitoring and holding this treaty when it benefits us not. We do this for all treaties, and maintaining more treaties puts more of a drain on our budget. If we cover this section of the hose with our thumb, we will have more water pressure elsewhere, equating into better communications and maintinence in the SOTO and other international laws which we take part in.

How else? OOC, server load. Cutting this fat would reduce the server load by approximately five Kb uploaded every day.

If we don't cut fat here, then we won't cut fat elsewhere. It adds up over time.

Date23:53:09, February 11, 2006 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageThen vote for the removal of gay rights and this Discfgjj-...treaty and then I'LL VOTE YES. K?

Date10:11:08, February 12, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Better Distribution of Funding, Treaty Withdrawal
MessageGays need official rights, but declarations are pointless.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 60

no
     

Total Seats: 211

abstain
 

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59